>>2
But modern day mixed race Mericans bear a lot of resemblance to the ancient saxons amirite?
Name:
Anonymous2008-05-09 6:25
>>3
'Mericans take pride in being American, not Saxon. Iranians take pride in an ancient foreign civilization that has nothing to do with them, other than occupying the same land a few thousand years ago.
Name:
Anonymous2008-05-09 12:47
>>4
Nice try at spinning the subject, but I guess you'll start crying when Greeks are mentioned...
Of all the mass imbecilities which have demoralised mankind, this of racial equality between all peoples, White, Black, Red and Yellow, is the most inane. Politically, it has already stirred up all the minor races into a state of belligerence and discontent which will impose minor wars on the dominant nations for years to come. But when it comes to racial integration between the White and Black races, sanity has descended to the looney bin of the impossible, because the intermixture of blood between those races must degrade the White race to the level of the Negro and cannot raise the Negro to the level of the White. Where today we see some evidence of the effect of education on the Negro it is the White blood in him that stirs some animation in his sluggish mental faculties, but the Negro pure, as he exists in Africa, cannot be educated even up to the standard of the lowest content of the White race. He may learn to parrot all the political and sociological clichés of today, but unless he is buttressed by the White race, and policed by it, he must relapse back to the jungle, which is his predestined habitat.
There appears to be an illusion today that this age is the first one in which the Negro has come into contact with a White civilisation, and so had a chance to benefit by its cultural and sociological ordinances. This is not the case. Since the genesis of this present civilisation some six or seven thousand years ago, the Negro has had contact with many past episodes of civilisation, but always, as each subsided, he has relapsed back to the jungle. The other three races, White, Yellow and Red, have devised their own civilisations, and have maintained them through the ages, but it is only in quite recent years that the Negro has come into relations with them. As in the past, his status has been one of slavery, because he has never been able to compete culturally with their achievements in the arts and crafts and intellectual standards. Nor can he compete today with those same achievements, because he utterly lacks the creative faculty: he has no thumbs. The only thing he ever learned to do was to smelt iron ore and hammer out his spear heads. That weapon was essential to the preservation of his existence in his tribal wars, and his food derived from wild animals able to defend themselves with teeth and claws.
Save for the Chinese, and other Asiatic peoples, all other civilisations were generated on the shores of the Mediterranean and the Negro penetration of them was very slight, except, perhaps, with the Egyptians, who were themselves a dark coloured race, but with no relation to the Negroid peoples. Only the Moors and Arabs, because of their geographical contiguity with Africa, have kept up the slave trade with Negroes, but sexual union with them was strictly prohibited. Or impossible for that matter. By a very simple clinical ritual, the Negro became a harmless guard and menial to the Harem. It is only since the colonisation of Africa by the British, Dutch, French and Belgian peoples that the Negro has become a momentous world problem within the last two decades. The British, French and Belgian peoples solved it for themselves by handing their colonies over to the Negroes. The Dutch could not do that. They had been so long in South Africa that they had built up another white race there—the Boers. And there, the world may be assured, they will remain, and the Negro will not be permitted racial equality with them. What must happen shortly between those peoples is already predestined. The only other country on which the full weight of the Negro falls is America.
And the Politician’s solution to it of race integration is a desperation measure which never can succeed, as the politicians themselves know, but at present, they dare not do anything about it, for President Johnson won the presidential campaign by handing himself over to the largest section of the community to command the vote, just as Roosevelt did to capture the presidential chair. We know that section, which is the pestilential problem of all peoples who seek to keep a sane balance of rationality in the conduct of their political and sociological affairs. In Australia, we call them Wowsers—a stigma word which Mencken incorporated in his American Language, but as yet Americans have not adopted it. A stigma word has great power.
In America the Wowser is the self-elected Dogooder—the temperance crank, the Purity Leaguer, the anti-saloon leaguer, the Comstock bookshop smasher and picture slasher; in short, that chapel product of the cheap suburbs and the rural back blocks which seeks to impose its own horrible codes and doctrines on all that makes life tolerable for well constituted humanity. They are the people who imposed Prohibition on America and very nearly wrecked the country. In Russia, they were largely responsible for the Revolution by cutting off the people’s need for liquor during the 194 war. They are the Pacifists—the peace at any pricers, the appeasers at any threat of war which thereby makes it inevitable by inviting aggression from piratically inclined nations. They are today trying to cripple Johnson’s handling of the Viet Nam war: the finest piece of statecraft since the great days of England as a world power, when half a dozen words from Lord Salisbury was enough to send Russia scuttling back from the Oxus. It is a great pleasure to know that our men are fighting with the Yanks, and that more are being trained to follow, if needed.
It is the Wowser, then, to use one stigma term for a generic type common to America, England, and Australia, who is doing all the mischief today by inflating the Negro with a state of megalomania which convinces him that he is the victim of monstrous injustice by the white peoples, and all revenges on them are his by right of martyrdom. And that revenge he will take whenever he has power to do so.
We must concede him injustice so far in that the Whites have invaded his country and taken possession of large sections of it. In the past, they made a commodity of him in the slave market. Those same Whites have now handed back to him the sections of country they had occupied and have freed him from slavery. Justice can go no further than that.
But America, swung off a sane balance of rationality by the maudlin sentimentality of the Wowsers for the assumed sad lot of the Negroes, has allowed its politicians to establish them in equal civil and social rights with the Whites. They have ordained that the white children must consort intimately with the black offspring from infancy to adolescence, and that alone insures sexual intimacy between the two races. That American mothers—always so passionately possessive over their young—should have allowed them to do such a noxious thing is evidence that they are too dazed by the bulldozing tactics of the politicians to realise its inevitable consequences. It is assumed that education will dispose of the physiological compulsions inherent in all such propinquity of the human species.
Education! This age has become besotted over its assumed potentialities to perform a universal miracle, which is that text books alone can create a civilisation. It ignores the irrefutable evidence that only a civilised mind can be educated. Education is nothing more than a procedure for exercising intellectual faculties which are a content of the mind at birth. It has taken the white race six thousand years to develop those special faculties on which all civilisations have been built. The craftsman’s fingers, the musician’s ear, the artist’s hand and eye, the scientist’s investigation of all natural phenomena are inherited from progenitors who have left behind them the brain cells, and the muscular reflexes essential to all creative effort. And it is now assumed that education, in a generation or two, will allow the wretched Negro to develop those special faculties and so allow him to compete on equal terms with the White race as a civilised being. Imbecility can go no further than such a preposterous assumption.
Already the Negro mass is in a vicious state of resentment because it has not straightway been vested in all the rights and privileges of the Whites. The Los Angeles episode is a sufficient evidence of a universal state of mind among the Negroes. And that is only the beginning of the trouble. When he finds that the higher-class whites will not consort with him on equal terms, and that there is no place for him among the trained working class, no police force in the world will be adequate to control him.
Americans are not a docile people when politicians impose arbitrary interdictions on the free conduct of their civic rights and their private lives. The politicians’ failure to inflict Prohibition on the American people is evidence of what they must expect by this proposal to impose racial integration with the Negroes on them. It only required an adjustment of the legal code to dispose of Prohibition, but no such adjustment can solve the Negro problem for them. There is only one possible solution to that, but I am not going to take it on myself to suggest it. It must be already pregnant in the minds of all higher class American thinkers today.
Prove the languages are related. Right here, right now.
Name:
Anonymous2008-05-12 10:16
>>24
Oh, of course, let me waste my time to show a truth universally recognized by every expert and everyone with a bit of education, to a butthurt retard who for some reason refuses this simple fact. That's a nice way to spend my time.
i'm not going to enjoy something motivated by theories.
Name:
Anonymous2008-05-13 14:16
>>30
EVOLUSHON IZ LIEEES!!! EEEVIL MARKSIST-DARWINIST CONSPIRACISTS ARE DESTROYING OUR KHRISHUN SOCIETY!!!
Name:
Anonymous2008-05-13 16:12
Indo-European is a theory to explain why so many modern languages have similarities. It's an interesting theory, but there are no known words from this proposed Proto-Indo-European language.
Name:
Anonymous2008-05-13 16:16
The indo-europeanists want to get rid of the uniqueness of several languages. They've succeeded with Albanian and Armenian.
>>33
You don't know much about linguistics, do you?
Name:
Anonymous2008-05-15 1:19
Etymology and Linguistics are very biased. They like to stick to this "we're all family" perspective. The similarities between Sanskrit and Greek are nothing more than a few borrowed words, they didn't originate from the same source. It happened during Alexander the Great's campaigns in Asia.
Name:
Anonymous2008-05-15 2:19
>>35
that's not what "they" teach therefore you're wrong.
Name:
Anonymous2008-05-15 3:03
I love how people talk about "this language is related to this one" when they don't know a single word in either one of the languages.
Name:
Anonymous2008-05-15 3:39
I'm from a shitty small or 3rd world country and Indo-Europeans killed my language :angry:
Actually, the most unique language in the world is Korean. It's in its own family, has its own writing system that wasn't derived from Proto-Sinaitic (unlike English, Hindi, Arabic etc).
Fuck yeah KOREA
Name:
Anonymous2008-05-23 0:38
>>49
Why does that matter? Korea's not even a real country anyway.
Name:
Anonymous2008-05-23 6:31
>>49
YOU DO REALIZE THERE ARE THEORIES CONNECTING KOREAN AND JAPANESE TO THE ALTAIC GROUP, AND THEREFORE YOUR LANGUAGE IS ABOUT AS UNIQUE AS FUCKING ARMENIAN IN FACT I LIKED >>42 BETTER
Name:
Anonymous2008-05-24 2:43
Start learning languages instead of making generalizations based on things you read.
Name:
Anonymous2008-05-24 2:51
IF YOUR LANGUAGE IS UNIQUE YOU DESERVE SPECIAL PRIVILEGES AND NEED TO WALK AROUND ALL DAY PATTING YOURSELF ON THE BACK AT HOW UNIQUE AND SPECIAL YOU ARE
YOU'RE A HERO!
Name:
Anonymous2008-05-24 18:23
>>52
WITHOUT KNOWING A LANGUAGE ITSELF, YOU CAN'T KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT IT!!!! YOU MUST LEARN MY SHITTY THIRD-WORLD LANGUAGE IF YOU'RE GOING TO TALK ABOUT SCIENTIFICALLY PROVED THEORIES ABOUT IT.
AND WHAT'S THE DEAL WITH LINGUISTS, ANYWAY...
Name:
Anonymous2008-05-24 18:38
>>54
Linguists are skilled in the art of jacking other guys off with their tongues. If they ever kneel in front of you and unzip your pants one late night be sure to kick them in the face.
what makes it "scientifically proven"? because some white people said so?
Name:
Anonymous2008-05-25 6:14
>>56
Whom should we trust to explain those sciences that take years of top notch education to understand? Do we have to wait until the black community approves?
There's no doubt the Latin languages are related. There's no doubt all those Slavic languages are related. There's no doubt the Germanic languages are related. Those are almost absolutely proven. What people like me are bitching about is the Indo-European theory getting rid of the uniqueness of certain languages.
Name:
Anonymous2008-05-25 16:49
people don't like seeing other people as unique.
Name:
Anonymous2008-05-25 16:51
>>59
Why should anyone give a shit how unique a language is anyway?
Name:
Hayakyan Armenyan2008-05-25 17:02
>>61
YOU JUST CAN'T UNDERSTAND HOW WE FEEL BAAAWWWWWWWWW
Name:
Anonymous2008-05-26 16:38
>>62
You have the freedoms to feel how you want, but if you can't convince enough people to care you have no right to force things on them.
Name:
Anonymous2008-05-26 17:03
>>63
You have the freedom to think retarded bullshit, but since you can't convince anyone with crying you have no right to force people to see your retardation.
Name:
Anonymous2008-05-27 1:37
>>64
Sorry but you forgot to back up your assertions with facts. I'll wait while you do so.
Name:
Anonymous2008-05-27 12:41
>>65
But you didn't back up your similar assertions with facts, yet you for somehow expect me to do so. This generally happens when the fallacious logic of a retard is exposed, and the screams BAK UP VIT FAKTS, while none of the bullshit the retard spurted out was backed in any way, is of course, simply a post-ownage crying.
Name:
Anonymous2008-05-27 15:16
>>66
If your assertion is that I did not back up my assertions with facts you should be able to prove it by merely linking to where I made an assertion with no facts to back it up.
Name:
Anonymous2008-05-27 15:32
>>66
Sorry, I assumed that you would be able to see a post above what you cried about. You spurted out >>63, but cried when you saw >>64, which has equal validity.
I'll wait until you finish crying.
Name:
Anonymous2008-05-27 18:47
>>68
Dear me you've managed to spout shit enough to get into a ridiculous argument in this thread too? You must be a popular one in real life.
>>69
Dear me, you get extremely butthurt after perpetual ownage caused by your delusional beliefs stemming from your retardation so that you felt the need to post that. I'd assume you exhibit the same traits in "real life".
Name:
Anonymous2008-05-28 11:52
Has anyone proven Farsi and English are related yet?
Name:
Anonymous2008-05-28 12:12
>>71
No one has proven anything. All those years of linguistic research was all jew lies. You may now kill Iranians - they're mixed with arabs anyway.
Not only you're a retard denying universally recognized truth, but you don't even know shit about the very simple subject at hand.
Which shouldn't be surprising, really...
You don't know anything about the subject at hand. Tell me two related words right now in Persian and English. Oh wait you can't, it's because you know what's going on and I don't.
he doesn't have to prove anything to you? Why? Because it's like evolution, we're going to say we're related to a 3,000,000 year old 3 foot nigger monkey because "the skeleton has wide hips". We don't need no evidence, just what appears to be. Learn a thing or two then come back.
Name:
Anonymous2008-06-02 11:45
>>76 It's like reading translations of the Daodejing by "qualified people" yet by their own admission they can't read or speak Chinese and upon close inspection of their English translation with the original Chinese version shows very little resemblance.
Name:
Anonymous2008-06-02 13:42
>>75
Not only you're trying to ignore truth by DERP DERP YOU MUST PROVE WHAT EVERY EXPERT KNOWS TO MY RETARDED MIND WITH A COMPLETELY RETARDED UNSCIENTIFIC WAY!!!
There's a difference between borrowing words such as what English did with Latin than actually evolving from a language. Etymologists seem to ignore this and want this "we're all related" crap.