Obama is Finished.

Obama threw his "spiritual mentor" (the racist, anti-American, Marxist preacher Jeremiah Wright) not under the bus today but actually off the planet.
What a man of conviction you Obama supporters have chosen to back.....Too little, too late. You're man is FINISHED!!

>Jeremiah Wright
>Marxist

Is this a part of "everyone is socialist/communist" meme/trolling that is on this board?

Obama never had a chance, so any "he's finished NOW!" declaration is a pointless point.  Obama's only function is to get the unwanted Democrat factions out and voting, but not for anyone but the White globalist who must be the party's nominee.  Obama's function is to get the Blacks and young folk motivated to vote, but he'll have to bow to Clinton when she inevitably gets the party nomination at the Convention.  By bowing, he'll endorse her.  By endorsing her, his stupid, STUPID voter block will turn around like sheep and 95% of them will obediently vote for HER -- the White globalist whom the Bilderberg controllers had already selected years before.

THIS IS HOW YOU GET BLACKS TO VOTE FOR THE WHITE CONTROLLERS.

>>3
Don't you get bored from repeating the same stuff in every thread containing the string "obama"?

It's gonna be funny to see RedCream eat those words when Obama wins.

If Clinton gets the nod, the dem. party will be shattered for the next 25 years.
Blacks WILL NOT vote for Clinton if she get the nom.
Obama can't beat McCain one on one.
It's another 4 years for the repubs.

>>4
I never tire of pointing out ANY truth that is commonly dismissed.

>>5
Don't count on it (Obama's winning, I mean).

>>6
The Dem Party is shattered NOW.  Oooh, you're so scary!  Next you're going to tell me that the Dem Party doesn't actually represent the working-class constituents that should form its core economic values.

And you're DEAD WRONG about who the Blacks will vote for.  The Blacks that have defected to the Repubs have already defected.  Those who remain still vote Dem since they think they have no choice since the Repubs are the party of Rich White Evil.  Obama will not make the nomination, and his voters will feel compelled to vote for whomever he endorses.  That means Clinton.  Case closed.

However, you're probably right about the ultimate winner of the election.  McCain can scare enough Americans with threats of Arabs and Socialists, to clinch a simple-majority win ... Obama or Clinton, that's the real plan here.  We might see an elector or two defecting, but that's about it.  McCain and the Oil Party for the next 4 years.  Gasoline will climb by at least 50c per year, YOY.  Iran will be attacked (producing a nearly instant 50c rise in gas price).  And some REAL conflicts will occur with the old Soviets and China, since by attacking Iran, the USA will essentially tell the world it intends to occupy and own one of the largest single reserves of petroleum.  Anyone who thinks that Russia and China will take that lying down, is in deep denial.

>>7
LOL Shows how much you know, DistendedAnusCream.
Don't quit your day job (if you have one) to become a political analyst.

>>8
LOL.  You didn't debate or address even ONE of my points.

You know what that means?  I WIN BY DEFAULT.

REDCREAM WINS AGAIN!

What points? Blacks will vote for Hillary if she wins the nom.?
You're WRONG. There's nothing to debate or address.

You agreed with me that McCain will be president. What's to address or debate if you agree with me?

You can't possibly be as dense as you appear to be.
You're so dense that you should change your name to BlackHoleCream.

(ZOMFG! I SO OWN YOU!)

Obama has enough supporters indoctrinated from birth to see prejudice and discrimination everywhere to dismiss all criticism as motivated by racism. You see it on a day to day basis, even if a supporter agrees with the critic they will still say he is being singled out for being black or something.

>>9
>>10
I was almost going to say that you had trace amounts of win in your post, but you ruined it with this butthurt response.

At this point the American public will vote for a Republican for the next 4 years. But were not too bright us Americans.

Like keeping our hands in the car door as we keep slamming it with the war, economy, etc.

>>11
What points? Blacks will vote for Hillary if she wins the nom.? You're WRONG. There's nothing to debate or address.
That's exactly what happens with Blacks and the Democrat Party.  They line up and resignedly vote for the rich White globalist since he is the endorsed Democrat.  They did it for the rich White globalist Gore in 2000, and the rich White globalist Kerry in 2004.  They did it for the semi-rich White globalist Clinton in 92 and 96.  WAKE UP.

It seems that you're denying fucking reality and history.  Good luck with that, since you're DEMONSTRABLY WRONG.  And Obama's defeat and endorsement of Clinton is only going to rub your nose in my extreme correctness.

According to you, Blacks just sat at home in 2000 and 2004 instead of voting.  PROVE THEY SAT AT HOME OR ADMIT I'M CORRECT.

You agreed with me that McCain will be president. What's to address or debate if you agree with me?
You're still PROVABLY WRONG about Obama.  Obama has ZERO chance to win, since he can't be the endorsed Dem since he's not a rich White globalist.  Apparently you've never heard of the DNC, either.

Past being DEAD WRONG about Obama, McCain is still likely to win the Presidential election, as you imply.  My particular reasoning is that he still tickles the racist and fear and class organs in the American public.  We already know a full 50% of the voting public will pull the Republican lever no matter who runs.  But the Dems can't play the critical Fear Factor without demonstrating they are just bastardized forms of the Republican Party ... and why vote for half a Republican when you can just vote for the full Republican in McCain?

>>13
You don't have the equipment or expertise to detect the FREQUENCY OF WIN that I deliver with some regularity.

I still wonder at the wisdom of even considering voters in the equation for who gets elected president.

Seeing as nobody appears to have remembered the electoral college and its ultimate purpose, or the lack of importance of the popular vote, this entire thread is fail. Yes, Red, you've proven that you can outmaneuver those idiots with arguments that go off half-cocked, but you still fail for arguing a foregone conclusion.

We failed as soon as McCain, Obama and Clinton became the front-runners; We set ourselves up for this failure every two years when jackasses promise us fabulous rewards and easy lives if they represent us, and we swallow their lies. We still have enough Republicans to remind us to be scared about terrorists before we vote, and we haven't been scared long enough to be dull to that fear, victory goes to McCain.

>>16
Gb2 2004, fear of terrorists is a negligible election issue. If anything fear of terrorism is lower than it should be, only whining libfags pretend they are living in a dystopia where fear of terrorism and persecution of muslims is being used by a fascist  dictator and "the rich" to gain power.

>>17
Fair enough. Substitute terrorism with gas prices and the economy, and you're updated for this incarnation of herding the populace. I'm still pondering why we've been told about Syria's supposed nuclear program without any provocation if terrorist fear is becoming passè.

>>18

Well, its also possible that Syria actually is developing nuclear weapons. I don't know enough about the situation to say how likely that is, but it would explain the reports, no?

>>16
Ubie, there have been no serious problems with the Electoral College, which I've mentioned in previous postings.  99.99% of the electors throughout history have voted in line with the popular vote that drove them.  The last time an elector didn't do what was expected of them was in 2000, when the DC elector for Gore didn't cast her vote, or something like that.  Ooooh, scary!

As for arguing a foregone conclusion, you'll have to explain that one.  Obama is a clear Black/young voter collector, and that's what I've been arguing.  McCain is likely (but not guaranteed) to win the Presidency anyway.  What about any of that is foregone?

As for a judgment of fail, yes, once again about 95%+ of voting Americans have had their practical choices removed entirely, and they will end up voting for a pro-corporation, rich, White, globalist, pro-war, anti-worker, anti-middle-class motherfucker.  95%+ of the vote will be narrowed to either Clinton or McCain, which isn't a choice at all.  Of course, the vote majority could be 80% and still wind up with the same set of non-choices.  I recall the 1992 election very well, and even with 19% of the popular vote, that nutty Texan still ended up with ZERO electoral votes.  There wasn't any particular fraud in that, either.  The person with the largest share of each state's popular vote (for the most part, as there are a few states that apportion) gets ALL the electoral votes for that state.  So being a significant 3rd runner meant absolutely ZERO for the nutty Texan.  The system is setup to reward only ONE party, and that's the party that pulls in the largest block of voters.  From there, a simple coalition of two parties could lock up American politics forever, as they use feigned differences to give Americans (ever "stupider" in each successive generation) the minor choice while the major choice has been obliterated.

Well, you know all that.  But Americans love to vote for the winner, and the weakness in the system is best represented by pointing at the average voter and laughing my fucking ass off.

>>17
Gb2 2004, fear of terrorists is a negligible election issue.
Yeh, that's why Americans rose up and voted in Democrats that put a stop to the war and all the lies about why the war is being fought.

Oh, WAIT -- that latter part never happened!  So it appears that I WAS RIGHT AGAIN and some 4chan shitmonkey like you was fucking wrong again.

The MURDER DEATH KILL ARABS party line is still very strong in the American so-called psyche and if you think differently, you're not actually THINKING.  The common American whines a bit about the costs of war, but as soon as somebody proposes actually LEAVING IRAQ, the common stupid fucker IMMEDIATELY starts squawking about how terrible that would be.  So the denial is extremely deep, and it reveals a similarly deep desire to murder all Arabs.  McCain obviously plays up to that, and the Democrat side of thing likes to just sit on their hands and let it happen without a lot of rhetoric.  When push comes to shove (i.e. a Congressional vote), the true stance of the Congress and the people is clear:  CONTINUE MURDERING ARABS.  Seeking to murder on such a scale is due to a clear fear on the part of the common motherfucker.  So we're inevitably back to seeing that fomenting Arabfear is a winning strategy for American politics.

>>18
I never said the terrorism issue is the only factor that swings elections. Also no one wants to murder arabs, only a few 55 year old rednecks think like that, all the people on /b/ being bigotted are just doing it to troll you.

The people dont want to murder arabs, but the US goverments sure loves doing it.

>>21
I never said the terrorism issue is the only factor that swings elections. Also no one wants to murder arabs, only a few 55 year old rednecks think like that, all the people on /b/ being bigotted are just doing it to troll you.

>>15
Blacks never had a candidate of their own running who actually has a chance to win the nom. In fact, he is the FRONTRUNNER.

This time it's MUCH more personal with the black electorate. If they feel Obama was cheated out of the nom. by the super delegates, they will either stay home or vote for McCain out of spite.

If you knew anything about human nature you would have been able to figure this out.

C'mon StinkCream, you're making this too easy. I feel almost guilty calling my WIN a WIN because it seems your retardation is progressing and rendering you impotent (mentally and otherwise.)

>>25
That's why Obama is very likely going to be offered the Veep spot.  The Blacks will vote for the Clinton/Obama ticket, by concentrating on Obama and not minding so much the rich White globalist who is actually going to get their vote.

That you think Blacks will vote en masse for McCain if Obama is not nominated, is absolutely absurd and it's amazing that you'd make such a silly statement on any message board.  Some staying at home will be expected, but largely the Blacks vote in their pathetic turnout rates for Democrats since that's largely what they feel they can do to stop the Conservatives from shipping them all back to Africa.

And finally, there is no such thing as a "frontrunner" in a primary race with two candidates.  One of them will be chosen by the superdels, and that will be that.  It doesn't matter if one is "beating" the other by 5%+.  The elites will choose, and almost to the last person of their population, the elites had ALREADY made their choice years ago.  And that choice is CLINTON.

You guys are racist for acting like blacks don't think for themselves and vote in a block.

>>26
If Obama does get the nom., what will you say to all of us then?

Will you still have the courage to even post anymore?

Better yet, why don't you back up your prediction with something. How about an agreement that you will never post in 4chan again if Obama gets the nom. ( If you are as sure of yourself as you seem to be, you'll say yes. Amirite?)

>>27
Ok some blacks won't vote for Obama. Now that I've said this I'm not racist anymore and voting for Obama just because is black is still racist.

>>27
Voting blocks are a staple part of political strategy.  You're wrong.

>>28
If Obama gets nominated, then I'll be wrong and will have to admit it.  You only imagine I won't poast anymore since people like you are very prevalent, and that's what YOU do when you're wrong.  Unlike you pack of cowards and people of low character, when I'm wrong, I man up and admit it.

But for Obama's nom, I'm not wrong.  There's no way a Black Corporate-Socialist can get the nomination from the DLC, and anyway they've had Clinton in their pocket for years, so the conclusion is OBVIOUS.  I mean, you DO know the DLC actually runs the Democratic Party, right?

P.S.  I don't link my predictions to my continued poasting on 4chan.  Only girly men like yourself would submit to such a thing.  I'll argue as strongly as I can muster, and win or lose as gracefully as my character demands.  I'm sure that when Obama does lost the nomination, you asstards and fuckbags will vanish like farts in a windstorm, refusing to even accept that EVERYTHING I SAID was utterly true and that you were UTTERLY FALSE to follow a line of thinking that was based upon wishes and hopes and spun moonbeams.

>>30
I have this response in my file now and I'm going to use it as a reply to any post you make after Obama wins the nom. LOL

I knew you wouldn't accept the challenge, you obviously don't have any courage. I'm willing to take on the challenge. If I'm wrong, you'll never see another post from Anonymous again.

Looks like he's won RedCream....Lolipop!!! :)

>>30
>Corporate-Socialist
Stop using fucking oxymorons with no meaning. That bullshit they spew is liberalism and nothing else.

redcream YOU LOSE haha

It's over, Sony is finished.

>>35
faggots like the ps3

>>36
I would have thought the wii was more up their alley, considerring the length and girth of the wiimote along with it's general faggotry.

Barack means thunder in Hebrew.

>>38
...and it sounds like Yarak, cock in Turkish.

Allow me to gloat over RedCream's prediction, which failed not once but TWICE