Chance to prove race doesn't exist.

Debunk everything in this book to prove there is no reason to believe race doesn't exist.
http://www.charlesdarwinresearch.org/Race_Evolution_Behavior.pdf

oops

In b4 libfags fixate on one irrelevant mistake to avoid the issue.

People who base their decisions on appearance and NOT on behavior are just lunatics and morons, and we more moral people can safely disregard them.

>>4
That's all fine and well, but too many people use this moral and political argument as an excuse to deny the truth about race.

>>3
That's a libfag classic. They manage to find an insignificant error in an 800 page book like The Bell Curve and they act like they have refuted the whole thing.

Once again, RedCream to the rhetorical pontification liberation front. Truth is, we seperate each other by differences even as slight as though they may be to segregate ourselves as individuals, but shame, impotence, and extinction sets in when we discover we are all alone because of the same action. FOR FUCK SAKE! GROW THE FUCK UP! And as for >>5, yeah! All REEDCram does is point out one flaw and thinks he's back on top, KING O THE HILL...of bullshit that is! To disregard appearance as insignificant and only focus on behavior is to ignore the entirety of the individual in the first place. Hear that, RedChin, ya ignorant overweight scruffy lookin bastard. Put down the cheezy poofs, stop multi-tasking between this forum and World of Warcraft or Everquest and get "back to reality. Your mom's on crack and your sister's got nut stains on her back." -Insane Clown Possy

>>5
That's why we have the Second Amendment.  Minority groups can keep and bear arms and shoot the racist motherfuckers when they find themselves under siege.

>>6
Hush.  The adults are talking and you're just interrupting.  Now go and play, and when dinner's ready, we'll call you.  SCOOT!

There are differences between races but they are only significant when a large group of individuals from those races are pushed to their limits, such as the olympics.

>>8
And how are they insignificant when Blacks in the U.S. have an average IQ of 85 and Whites an average IQ of 100, when IQ predicts a LOT of microeconomic and macroeconomic phenomena and virtually seals the economic fate for groups? Having an economic underclass that, to say the least, and don't deny it, 'looks' a certain way while there are libfags lying about equality and such nonsense will only cause trouble.

>>9
DERP DERP DERP DERP AVRAG AYE KWOOO DERP DERP DERP DERP I HAVE AN IQ OF TWELVE BUT DAT DOESN'T MATTER BECAUSE I HAVE PALE SKIN AND THAT SOMEHOW MEANS I'M BETTER THAN ALL BLACKS DUE TO AVRAG!!!!!

>>10
Now that you mention it, skin colour alone has a correlation of 0.92 with IQ
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2005.04.002

>>11
OH MY GOD, I WAS AFRAID OF THIS

FEW DAYS AGO I LEFT MY BASEMENT AND ACCIDENTALLY GOT A BIT OF SUN, SO THAATS WHY I'VE BEEN FEELING SO STOOPID...

>>12
Actually, it's the average skin colour of a group based on the genome and not phenotype.

>>12
Why does skin colour alone have a correlation of 0.92 with IQ?

If a liberal does not disprove everything in this book soon I will have no choice but to start being racist against people I deem genetically inferior. They haven't even made a start.

>>14
Because IQ ~co-evolved with low temperatures, which ~co-evolved with skin colour. Average skin colour of a population has an even higher correlation than race and IQ, and with that high a correlation discriminating by intelligence based on average skin colour is pretty much justified when talking about populations. :)

>>15
I can disprove several things in the book, but I'm not a liberal. Niggers are still intellectually and behaviourally inferior to humans due to their genome structure.
This popped right up:
Heritability is the amount of variation in a trait due to the genes. A heritability of 1.00 means that the differences are inborn and the environment has no effect. A heritability of zero (0.00) means the trait is controlled by the environment and not at all by the genes. A heritability of 0.50 means that the differences come from both the genes and the environment.
The heritability of a trait is mostly based on both the population and the trait involved.
A heritability of 0 does not mean that a trait is not controlled by genes, it means that the trait is not controlled by genes in a said population. Despite that, it would be pretty hard to drop it to plain 0, whatever it was. That is, if we're actually talking about biological traits. For example, speaking English has a heritability of 0.
A heritability of 1 does not mean that the environment has no effect. Stochastic effects can account for significant differences. E.g., see bacteria culture studies and C. elegans longevity studies. In these examples genetically identical populations (So genes account for no difference.) are grown in the nearly the same environment. And yet there is significant variance in the populations.
Anyway, he only makes that mistake in this short text and not his methodology.

>>15
go ahead, please

if you couldn't comprehend it up to now, who says you'll be after this? Once you ignore the truth to satiate your bad feelings about failure at life, you don't quit.

in b4 hating racists is racist

>>18
in b4 hating racists is racist
No, but hating racists is discriminatory. Since racists aren't really made up of a single race (though most libfags consider that only Whites can be racists, whereas in reality they are the least racist, thus anti-racism as a political ideology can very well be a racist attack against Whites) it is not a racist action.

>>19
No, I'm pretty sure I hate retards regardless of their complexion.

>>20
egalitarian faggot

>>20
I do too. Since the anti-racists' spatial intelligence is lower than most Bushmen's if they can't distinguish between races (unless they are, of course, lying) I can safely pin them as retards.

>>22
Cry more, retarded loser.

>>22
This really is funny now that I think about it. The irony is hilarious. A retard, building his life on pseudoscientific bullshit to satiate his butthurt feelings about being pathetically retarded, saying this... It's brings a sad smile to people who have a functioning nervous system.

It is impossible to prove "race" as understood by retarded racists doesn't exist to them, because to their tiny minds every piece of scientific fact is jew lies, while on the other hand centuries old disproven notions are science to them, and the facts disproving them are again jew lies.

You know in those documentaries where they show primates learning 200 words as if it was a great thing, I think they should show racists on those programs. These people, despite having minds capable of only formulating the most primitive Aristotelean logic chains can stop at red lights, drink water without drowning, and even finish schools and get jobs, buy flowers to their girlfriends or wives. These should be shown not only in documentaries, but also in religious channels where they show some bugs and flowers and that way "prove the existence of god", they should show these weird organisms.

>>24-25
Hahahahahahaha.
Give the most retarded Stormfront member a world map and a box of crayons and he will still show a better picture of reality than any libfag will admit to:
http://img206.imageshack.us/img206/2119/scimagyh5.jpg
Source: http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/319/5866/1100
(Yep, centuries old study)

>>26
I have to say this is quite remarkable. I'm surprised how clear the racial lines seem.

>>26
Thanks for proving the point, retarded loser.

The maturity from the liberal side itt is amazing.

The idea that race is a social construct only has appeal to those who have been severely psychologically affected by racism. Most of those who have actually experienced racism eventually recover and put their extremism behind them, however the multitude who simply perceive everything to be racist(usually a result of the heavy propoganda of social liberal cliques) rarely relinquish their extremism. There is likely to be a factor behind both their desire to see racism everywhere and the inability to eventually mature and see sense.

RACISTS ARE MODERATE

ANTI-RACISTS ARE FUCKING EXTREMISTS

...man this is getting really pathetic.

>>26
HAY GUYS, I SAW DAT ME AND MY FAMILY SHARE MORE GENES THAN OTHERS, SO THIS SOMEHOW JUSTIFIES RACISM AND ANNULS EVERY SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH DONE IN THE LAST CENTURY DISPROVING THESE RETARDED NOTIONS, AND ALL THAT NATURE VS. NURTURE RESEARCH WAS JEW LIES ANYWAYS, SO BRB GENOCIDE

>>31
Are you replying to 30? If so, well, damn really you are stupid.

>>32
You're right, your childish beliefs about equality have been falsified by modern genetics.

>>33
>>34
Good response to a troll, short and to the point. However you could have pointed out that the troll is using a strawman argument and no one here has said that anti-racism is neccesarily extremism, sharing genes equals superiority or that nurture does not play a role in developping someone's abilities.

necessarily*

DIE NAZI PUNKS
———————————————-/—-/
———————————————/—-/
——————————————--/—-/
——————————————-/—-/
——————————————/—-/
—————————————--/—-/
—————————————-/—-/
—————————————/—-/
————————————--/—-/
————————————-/—-/
————————————/—-/
———————————--/—-/
———————————-/—-/
———————————/—-/
——————————--/—-/
——————————-/—-/
——————————/—-/
—————————--/—-/
—————————-/—-/
—————————/—-/
————————--/—-/
————————-/—-/
————————/—-/
———————--/—-/
———————-/—-/
———————/—-/
——————--/—-/
——————-/—-/
——————/—-/
—————--/—-/
—————-/—-/
———--/´¯/'--'/´¯`·_
———-/'/--/—-/—--/¨¯\
——--('(———- ¯~/'--')
———\————-'—--/
———-'\'————_-·´
————\———--(
————-\———--\

>>34
If by modern genetics, you mean the 19th century, yes... Other than that, no respectable scientist shares your delusions, but you have that covered with "jew media", and "watson conspiracy", right retard?

>>35
Enjoy your inability to comprehend the truth, and cling on to pseudoscience to feel better about your pathetic self. Also, lots of circle-jerking and crying about DA STRAV MAN and BAWWW AD HOMINEM BAAWWWWW even though the arguments suggesting that you are retarded are far stronger than the irrelevant bullshit you copy paste and claim AY PROVVD RAYSIZM LOOK AT ME!!!!

>>25
/thread

>>38
Oh yes of course. Complaining that someone believes in logical  fallacies is BAAAWWWing over nothing and means I am a retard.