http://www2.hawaii.edu/~anu/ppt/history.ppt

Since the heads of state of didn’t agree to a treaty of merger with the United States and Hawaii, Hawaii is still legally a sovereign politic according the US Constitution and international law. There is only a joint resolution in the books…essentially no such treaty of annexation of any form exists.  Twice in Congress treaties of annexation (Not statehood btw) failed to pass.  You can read up more.

“Being an incident of war, military occupation confers upon the invading force the means of exercising control for the period of occupation. It does not transfer the sovereignty to the occupant, but simply the authority or power to exercise some of the rights of sovereignty.”

So technically it seems Hawaii is still under an occupation by the United States government since the late 1800s.  lol talk about suckers. JOIN THE EMPIRE BITCHES.

"The American Journal of International Law, volume 95, issue 4 (Oct., 2001), pp. 927-933, recently published an article on the Larsen vs. Hawaiian Kingdom arbitration case. The authors concluded "Because international tribunals lack the power of joinder that national courts enjoy, it is possible—as a result of procedural maneuvering alone—for legitimate international legal disputes to escape just adjudication. For example, in Larsen, the United States commanded an enviable litigation posture: even though the United States admitted its illegal overthrow of the Hawaiian Kingdom, it repeatedly refused to consent to international arbitration." On September 21, 2001 Mr. Larsen agreed to terminate the proceedings against the acting government at the Permanent Court of Arbitration, on condition that the acting government intercedes on his behalf at the United Nations level."
lol, wut.

Oh good. When can the rape and pillage begin?

>>3
Immediately.  We're starting with YOUR ASS.

The Hawaiian Islands are great but the natives are just fat peices of welfare trash who smell really bad.