ITT we discuss how and why did issues of nationality and/or ethnicity cause major European wars in the twentieth century, and why have the issues remained potent sources of discontent even during peacetime.
Name:
Anonymous2008-04-15 23:28
niggers
Name:
Anonymous2008-04-16 1:43
NATO has been the most diverse and most successful peacetime alliance in world history and was credited with keeping the world at peace for over 75 years.
/thread
Name:
Anonymous2008-04-16 13:18
The Jews poisoned the Roman Empire with their most evil invention: Christianity. The Roman Empire fell because of this and many wars followed, but the Aryan nations remained strong despite their division. The Jews continued trying to destroy the Aryan race and therefore created Islam. The Jews failed and the Aryan nations thrived and conquered most of the world. In the 19th century the Jews invented liberalism and communism to weaken the Aryan nations. They succeeded. Hitler waged the last battle against the Jews, but he failed. We are now their servants.
Name:
Anonymous2008-04-16 13:54
i wrote an essay on this in university, i got 80% and the lecturer basically said he couldn't have done much better, i will post if you like
>>5
You must have a different grading scale where you're from. 70 to 80% is the average range, from what I'm used to.
(No offense intended)
Name:
Anonymous2008-04-16 16:00
In WWI, a large number of factors coincided to create an incredibly volatile situation. These included both "issues of nationality and/or ethnicity".
WWII I would call much more cut-and-dry. Germany, collapsing and desperate from the fallout of the last War, managed to elect a bat-shit, crazy emo kid. Then they looked the other way while he installed himself as a dictator.
Name:
Anonymous2008-04-20 17:54
"The only thing we learn from history is that we learn nothing from history." Friederich Hegel
Name:
Anonymous2008-04-20 18:08
"Only the dead have seen the end of war" - Rome Total War
The First World War's Hitler was the Kaiser, there are surprising similarities. Another thing is that The Second World War was not so clear-cut, there are many factors including Hitlers rise to power, failure of the west to prevent the war and some factors from the First World War like arms race etc.
They should've thought that when they drafted Versailles, Saint-Germain, Trianon, Neuilly, Sevres etc. All of the losers of WWI succumbed to the lure of the Axis one way or the other (except Ottoman Empire/Turkey, which settled its score before WW2). So, next time make sure that you aren't being a faggot with the peace terms.
Name:
Anonymous2008-04-21 14:41
There was nothing wrong with the treaty, they just should have enforced it.
Name:
Anonymous2008-04-21 14:46
WWI was caused by a guy getting shot, learn some history dumbasses.
Name:
Anonymous2008-04-22 11:16
>>16
Unlike now, unfortunately, retarded people like you were actually in charge, and with that logic they drafted those insane terms, even some members of the French delegation said the terms were simply too harsh, but since this was "The war to end all wars", someone thought ze germans should be left with only their underpants, and simply it backfired.
>>19
The aformentioned retard of course, due to his condition, can not provide any arguments to the contrary, and to keep ignoring historical facts, he labels the opposing side as "stormfag", which is extremely hilarious considering the fact that knowledge is the nemesis of a stormfag.
Name:
Anonymous2008-04-22 13:49
WW1 - white kid shoots white guy and causes massive white people shitsorm
WW2 - white man mad over white shitstorm (WW1) causes white people to hate semi-white people (jews) as a ruse to gain power to invade other white nations causing lulzy white shitstorm part 2
Name:
Anonymous2008-04-22 15:57
Is this going to be a WW1+2 only thread or do the Yugoslav conflicts (during the ninites) also qualify as major European wars?