>>31
>>32
>>33
>>34
You keep saying there is gallons of proof but never post any. I already explained why I consider Bush to be socialist but you have been fixating on "bush is socialist" instead of the explanation so I guess there is no point in me repeating it for the 8th time.
Perhaps in another time and place you would be able to make me shut up and I would be
unable to point out your logical fallacies, but this is America. Sorry.
http://dis.4chan.org/read/newpol/1180954230/836
Does not sum up the thread, it sums up the collapse of your ideals when confronted to the idea that state socialism is as much of a negative force as crony capitalism.
This is the full picture.
http://dis.4chan.org/read/newpol/1180954230/827-834
As can be seen I explained why I believed the Bush administration was socialist, because most of the policies I disagreed with were/are socialist in nature.
>If I were to list my disagreements with his domestic policies it would consist mainly of excessive taxation and unnecessary regulation all in the name of benefitting the people. That said many republicans themsleves are suprised to hear themselves being called socialist even though they agree with me on the same points. Semantics? Or perhaps I am the only one willing to use that dirty word? You decide.
This is interesting.
http://dis.4chan.org/read/newpol/1180954230/814-815