I'll go on to sum up on how I wasted my time with this pathetically retarded moron who is so stupid that he thinks George fucking Bush is socialist, let's see.
>>812
An example of free market failing was provided. The reply was an irrelevant "less state control needed", which is hilariously ironic, as the subject was about a corporation monopolizing. The retard couldn't refute this, as it is hard to do it with facts, and his ignorance and retardation didn't help him much either.
The rest was a debaucle about macroeconomics. The fact that all valid macroeconomic theories. The retard first tried to ignore it, then probably google-searched, and thought Keynesian economics opposed his retarded view, and everything else agreed. Then he cited some irrelevant info about Keynesian economics which was not at all related to the field of discussion, which further proved his ignorance as he simply didn't know what was being talked about. After FINALLY getting that other valid theories too failed him, he simply kept crying and told "I proved it infallible", and then said state-capitalism and bush was socialist.
This debate proves one thing. If a retard believes one thing, he will defend it to death, if facts are presented against him, he'll just ignore it, keep crying, and say "I disproved it", while no actual information was given. This is a sad example of "Idle talk" Socrates describes, which leads to his death in the apology. Basically, someone makes up bullshit, and tells it to the retard. The retard, unlike the one who made it up, does not know it to be a lie, and does not have the capacity to judge whether something is true or not, so he repeats what he is being told with a fervor, believing it to be a fact because he doesn't have the intellectual background to think otherwise.