>>122
Clearly you have a reading disability. The public school system in the USA is STARTING from a bad and monopolistic condition. Introducing competition is a possible fix. It can't be MORE EXPENSIVE, so even if it doesn't deliver better education, it will still be a BETTER system since it will be CHEAPER.
Once again, you being a Finnish Socialist Faggot, you just don't understand the concept of measuring results by their COSTS.
In privatizing (as American education was in the 1800s), I'm taking the CHANCE that educational results will be greater. But we know to the nth degree about what does NOT work in the USA anymore, and that's a public school system. The professionals and politicians running the system can't be used to FIX IT. Hence, we have to get RID OF THEM. Getting rid of the entrenched and unionized LOSERS only means that we have to privatize.
This privatization can happen in steps, too, with measurable results along the way. No doubt your Socialist Faggotry doesn't accept that way, either. But regardless of how anyone feels about it, increased personal choice in the USA is coming. More and more parents are finding other options than the minority-filled uneducational institutions that the failing cities still operate as cash cows for themselves. This is going to get worse for the minorities before it gets better, but we have to try a fix that has at least a CHANCE of working. Using the same unionized LOSERS to fix it has NOT worked. Charlotte Iserbyt showed clearly how that didn't work.
So I say PRIVATIZE. Kick those unionized LOSERS to the fucking curb and let the profit motive come up with possible educational systems that work. If not? Well, 20 years from now, we'll know and arrive at a different solution. But after a good 20 years of trying to keep the same unionized LOSERS in charge, we know for a FACT that that choice DOES NOT WORK.