For a long time I've despised the idea of having big government, particularly when it comes to nanny-laws and such. I find it insulting that the government thinks it can take care of me and spend my money more wisely than I can.
But then as I walk out into public areas and shopping centers I realize most people are fucking retarded. Most people can't take care of themselves and they have no fucking idea how to handle the money that passes through their hands. So now I'm thinking that really, maybe people deserve a bloated government that will raise them birth to death.
But now I wonder, is there some way we can have two systems? One for the dumb and lazy, and one for the intelligent, motivated people? And could their be anyway that the intelligent people wouldn't be funding everything for people in the other group?
>>1
You're confusing cause and effect. The Nanny State has CAUSED people to become dependent upon it. Cut them off, and eventually they'll return to self-sufficiency.
Name:
Anonymous2008-03-02 0:03
>>2 either that or they kinda "die off". Metaphorical natural selection lol. Those that are motivated make it and the rest gets sloughed off
*shrug* It's like ripping off a band aid. Has to come off, but gonna hurt like a motherfuck.
Name:
Anonymous2008-03-02 0:44
Remove illegal immigrants and replace them with welfare leaches.
Name:
Anonymous2008-03-02 1:08
>But now I wonder, is there some way we can have two systems?
the second system is called having lots of money
Name:
Anonymous2008-03-02 4:28
>>5
Then it should be extended to those who are not stupid but are treated the same as them.
>>2
ITT: We are dumb and we don't know history >>4
Now we are dumb, and while we're advocating "competition" with libertarian crying, we simultaneously want to undercut it by prohibiting the cheap workers due to "arbitrary state influence" - in this case, being a citizen.
Name:
Anonymous2008-03-02 10:09
>>7 >>4 here, it's for security purposes so it's libertarian. They would have to leave and then enter legally through looser libertarian restrictions on immigration.
>>10
Yeah, but people manage to do it while you fail. Hmm... I think that says more about you being butthurt than the system...
Name:
Anonymous2008-03-02 22:32
There is one system, but there are two roles for it.
The first is the one in which you make the decisions for the idiots, this is the role of the rich white protestant male.
The second is anything else, but it's tricky, it can include white protestant males, but never are people rich in the second role for long.
See? Think about it a little bit and you'll realize your two ways are already available
=D
Name:
Anonymous2008-03-03 14:59
For a long time I've despised the idea of having big government, particularly when it comes to nanny-laws and such. I find it insulting that the government thinks it can take care of niggers and spend my money more wisely than I can.
But then as I walk out into public areas and shopping centers I realize most niggers are fucking retarded. Most niggers can't take care of themselves and they have no fucking idea how to handle the money that passes through their hands. So now I'm thinking that really, maybe niggers deserve a bloated government that will raise them birth to death.
But now I wonder, is there some way we can have two systems? One for the dumb and lazy niggers, and one for the intelligent, motivated people? And could their be anyway that the intelligent people wouldn't be funding everything for niggers in the other group?