Wikipedia is a steaming pile of shit

The articles are unreadable and have no direction or "point" to them. They don't put things into perspective; trivial and important facts seemingly blend into one.

Another issue is the huge volume of trival garbage is written on unimportant modern people and events. It's so biased in favor of the modern day you would think most important events have happened in the last 50 years.

It's a fine place to find hard facts like names and dates, but no substitute for reading a real fucking book.

To illustrate my point, a few hundred Anons protesting in "Project Chanology" get three times as big an article as one million negroes marching on Washington.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Chanology
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Million_Man_March

Because a few white people are worth easily that much

The internet is more important to the internet than the real world.

No, even Africa cares about getting a reliable high speed connection

history didn't happen the way the tellers say it did.

>>6
Your conception didn't happen the way your momma said it did, yet you are still a lighter hue than your 5 siblings.

Lets not get started on the MASSIVE liberal bias, which boarders on historical revisionism for alot of articles.

I acctually tried to write an article fullfilling Wiki's criterias - they deleted it five times even though it was LEGAL!!!

The only good *pedia is UncycloPEDIA
Alls others aren't Pedia but Pedo'ass

>>9
Encyclopediadramatica > unfunnypedia

Encyclopediadramatica is the information resource for a true anon. Nothing is sacred.

>>8
is this opposites day?

thank GOD for conservapedia

>>10
GTFO EDfag

HAY GUIES IM A GAIAFAG!!!!1 WUT IS THIS AIDS U SPEK OF