Hello libfags

So suppose the hereditarian hypothesis of the IQ gap is conclusively proven (though I don't really understand how it's not atm), and that Blacks will be, on average, dumber for the the foreseeable future.
My question to libfags is this. If it happens, will libfags then
1) support a Rawlsian argument (claim that genetic advantages are undeserved and unfair, and thus enforce substantial and permanent racial preferences)?
2) still be in complete denial of reality?
3) understand that we don't owe them anything, never have, never will?
Thanks.

>>7
Not OP. Denying that there are differences between racism is faggotry, I have seen libfags arguing that asians should be forced to use medication that is not suitable for the lactose intolerant in poor countries where it is difficult to test for allergies and other madness purely because they wish to deny scientific fact. You are right that the differences in intelligence are negligible once environmental factors are removed. However this is only because within races themselves there is a much greater variation in intelligence compared to the differences in the mean intelligence of racial groups. This means that meritocracy is the answer not some Marxist clean slate fantasy world. Eugenics may be obsolete but GENETICS IS SCIENTIFIC FACT. I hate stormfags but I hate libfags and there are a lot more of them.