Hello libfags

So suppose the hereditarian hypothesis of the IQ gap is conclusively proven (though I don't really understand how it's not atm), and that Blacks will be, on average, dumber for the the foreseeable future.
My question to libfags is this. If it happens, will libfags then
1) support a Rawlsian argument (claim that genetic advantages are undeserved and unfair, and thus enforce substantial and permanent racial preferences)?
2) still be in complete denial of reality?
3) understand that we don't owe them anything, never have, never will?
Thanks.

>>5

"Extend this further and you get the dangerous notion of all men being equal in material worth": dangerous to who? You mean dangerous to YOUR bank balance is clearly what you actually mean.

>>1

Sorry to break the news to you and your 'White pride' parade, but evan if the hereditarian hypothesis is conclusively proven, the IQ gap will probably be marginal. So far most of the comparison studies have purposfully chosen educated middle class white people and poorly educated working class black people. In addition to this many of the tests so far have been full of biased cultural referances that only these selected white candidates are familiar with. As such, the only thing that this 'evidence' proves is that educated, middle class citizens have higher IQ's than poorly educated members of the underclass...well no shit Sherlock, we already knew that.