Hello libfags

So suppose the hereditarian hypothesis of the IQ gap is conclusively proven (though I don't really understand how it's not atm), and that Blacks will be, on average, dumber for the the foreseeable future.
My question to libfags is this. If it happens, will libfags then
1) support a Rawlsian argument (claim that genetic advantages are undeserved and unfair, and thus enforce substantial and permanent racial preferences)?
2) still be in complete denial of reality?
3) understand that we don't owe them anything, never have, never will?
Thanks.

>>5
Wow, that's a carbon copy of what I think.

I consider myself more on the right too. Guaranteed rights, division of powers both vertically (local - state - federal) and horizontally (judicial - legislative - executive) are "right" in nature. They impose arbitrary limits on the power of elections, and the best things in the constitution are anti-democratic.

The vote, the idea that all men are equal in moral worth, is the left. Extend this further and you get the dangerous notion of all men being equal in material worth. But most sadly settle on allowing the vote and having some, but not total wealth redistribution. I support just the vote but with very strong enforcement of the anti-democratic checks in the constitution.

Of course, left != exactly liberal.