Hello libfags

So suppose the hereditarian hypothesis of the IQ gap is conclusively proven (though I don't really understand how it's not atm), and that Blacks will be, on average, dumber for the the foreseeable future.
My question to libfags is this. If it happens, will libfags then
1) support a Rawlsian argument (claim that genetic advantages are undeserved and unfair, and thus enforce substantial and permanent racial preferences)?
2) still be in complete denial of reality?
3) understand that we don't owe them anything, never have, never will?
Thanks.

>>19

"I am talking about the Jews. Having eugenic breeding practices for at least 500 years has raised their mean IQ to over 110. This is huge, as a mean..."

You just complimented Jews!!! That in itself is an act of Jewry (thus making you a kike). Now gimme all your jew gold!

>>39

Yes that's right- you've turned into a dumb nigger shiznat biatch!

>>41
I'm not too fond of Jews, they're too ethnocentrist and usually are that at the expense of others. And they set back human ecology for at least a generation (probably to secure their EGI by fucking others' EGIs) with Lewontin's fallacy. Fuck the Jews. That being said, they do possess a higher average intelligence, most likely due to eugenic breeding practices.

If your problem is with IQ, why not "discriminate" according to IQ directly? That way, if your claims are correct, most niggers would fall in the lower category, while smarter ones would be spared - but, oh wait, then you too would go down, right?