Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Hello libfags

Name: Reality 2008-01-26 14:42

So suppose the hereditarian hypothesis of the IQ gap is conclusively proven (though I don't really understand how it's not atm), and that Blacks will be, on average, dumber for the the foreseeable future.
My question to libfags is this. If it happens, will libfags then
1) support a Rawlsian argument (claim that genetic advantages are undeserved and unfair, and thus enforce substantial and permanent racial preferences)?
2) still be in complete denial of reality?
3) understand that we don't owe them anything, never have, never will?
Thanks.

Name: Reality 2008-01-27 18:41

>>17
Of course individual differences exist, and they also do within a race. Gene flow is not homogeneous within a population, you know. However, let me put it as clear as I can, and it will save a ton of explanation.
The IQ of offspring is roughly calculated as (midparent IQ + race IQ)/2 + the Gaussian distribution of intelligence. If there were 1000s of you and 1000s of your, say, 138 IQ Black wife, statistically the offspring will average (~138+85)/2 because the Gaussian distribution would just fade away in the average. It is possible that you have slightly better genes, so the race IQ will be a little higher. Nothing drastic though. Regression to the mean of the gene-flow population always happens, and it is the reason why we can't just breed people for intelligence in a short time. It's the same with height. Two really tall parents will statistically have the offspring regress to the mean of their population (race).
my existence and that of many other intelligent black people that I know, proves that individual differences quite obviously DO exist.
It proves that gene expression is distributed on a Gaussian curve, and that you won the phenotypical lottery. What you're saying is called the ecological fallacy, when individual measurements are generalised to a group.
Please feel free to enlighten us. Who exactly did GAIN from this? Was it the 6 million dead Jews?
The Nazis had no real eugenic policy except aborting severely retarded and genetically flawed fetuses. Yes, I am talking about the Jews. Having eugenic breeding practices for at least 500 years has raised their mean IQ to over 110. This is huge, as a mean...
With regards to your implicit suggestion that blacks should either be oppressed in society (or 'eugenically cleansed' maybe?), then I think you should actually go and hang yourself. Also please webcam the act, so that black people can watch and laugh at your basement-dwelling pale corpse as it swings to and thro, just like the corpses of my ancestors who were lynched by racist, sub-human scum like you. Your Aryan dream is over...wake up.
I never said they should be oppressed. Please point it out or retract. I'm just saying the Black-White IQ gap is just how things worked out and there is nothing anyone can do to fix it. Libfags are just throwing money in the toilet with this, on the assumption that there is something wrong. If there is some environmental factor like nutrition that CAN help Blacks reduce 1-2 points in the gap, libfags are detrimental to any progress in that area. As for ignoring it, it will not make it go away.
Your ancestors were lynched by 'racist, sub-human scum like me'? How many fucking ancestors did you lose from the 3446 Blacks that died by lynching from 1882-1968?! If you actually had that IQ, which I doubt, you wouldn't repeat libfag myths that make NO sense. In fact, you read like a White libfag, though I may be wrong. If you are a Black libfag, feel free to answer OP question. Note the 'suppose.'

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List