>>27
"Should I take this as your choice being "2) still be in complete denial of reality?"?' Interpret my words however you wish. Either way you shall inevitably dismiss me as a 'libfag' (whether or not I actually am a liberal, is of no relevance, so I shall not tell you). And please do not patronise me with 'suggested reading lists', as I am well read in such matters as these. Your true nature was made clear to me, by your words "I couldn't care less". These four words seem to pretty much sum up the entire conservative ideology really- non of you could care less; you do not 'care' about anything other than your own debauched agenda.
I must say I find the choice of your posting name rather ironic: "Reality"- are you sure this is something you have an entirely firm grasp of? H Your deluded ramblings strike me as possessing a somewhat racist and hateful overtone. What actually drives you to support that line of argument? Is it really freedom of speech and accademic thought, like you claim, or just plain hatred and bigotry? So far, you have proven yourself to be an advocator of racism, autocracy and hatred of the left wing. By definition you are a fascist.
As such, I shall not even attempt to debate with you, as fascists, by definition do not listen to anything other than their own dogma; their belief that there are only two groups in the world: 'us and them' (your own 'us and them' attitude is demonstrated by your view of everyone being a right-winger, or a 'libfag').
I would strongly advise everyone else to do likewise. You are only wasting your breath on those who are not worthy of it.
The sadest thing is that you are clearly a very intelligent individual. Such a shame that you flush your potential down the toilet (in the same way that you claim 'lib-fags' flush money), by resounding an utterly fallacious doctrine, which is an obvious tool used to bring your political agenda into effect.
P.S. Do not bother replying. I shall not be back.