>>25
I don't see any point to this thread. Even if this theory is proven to be correct, then what use will this knowledge be? What practical application could such results possible hold?
Libfags are currently flushing money down the toilet on programs such as affirmative action, because they deny differences in cognitive ability are causing Blacks' income to be, er, less than Whites'. In fact, Blacks as a group are earning almost exactly as predicted by IQ, if we ecologically correlate Blacks', Whites' and Asians' income with IQ.
Now that you are up to date with facts, read OP question again.
May I ask [Reality] what the purpose of such a geneticist crusade would be, if not to provide an excuse to enact social discrimination against black's?
First of all, I'm not a geneticist, I'm an evolutionary biologist, but what we're talking here about is psychology. Secondly, my 'crusade' is for academic freedom and truth. And my 'crusade' amounts to asking a fucking question to a text board (here). If social discrimination of Blacks is due, that's up to people to decide. (Hey, why limit it to Blacks, btw?) Though, not on the false information and propaganda that people are fed now.
Imagine what would happen if such findings were proven true and released to the public.
I'm fapping to the mere thought. Everything's already documented in academic journals, and the aggregated data is huge and can only mean one thing. I don't see anyone physically harmed over this data, EXCEPT THE FUCKING RESEARCHERS. Far leftist groups are the only ones reacting to this with violence.
Employers would refuse to employ black people (even those who are very intelligent) based upon the false notion that they are all stupid.
Wrong. There's a Gaussian distribution in intelligence, and there's no one on my side who has ever denied it. So intelligent Blacks are, of course, possible. Racial quotas based on the fact that we're all equal shouldn't happen as they do today.
Although im sure you are not advocating such an outcome, I can assure you that it what would happen ('Statistics' and 'empirical evidence' are always abused in the real world).
1) It won't. Nothing will probably change, though some things should. For example, I would advise for a pretty public announcement that miscegenating with a Black person will make your offspring intellectually inferior as a health risk (at most in 2-3 generations), due to regression to the mean. In before objection, but this is simply fact (A "fact" in science is an observation, while "theory" in science is an explanation of the observations.) proven with empirical data, which is best explained by the hereditarian theory.
2) I couldn't care less.
3) Should I take this as your choice being "2) still be in complete denial of reality?"?