Hello libfags

So suppose the hereditarian hypothesis of the IQ gap is conclusively proven (though I don't really understand how it's not atm), and that Blacks will be, on average, dumber for the the foreseeable future.
My question to libfags is this. If it happens, will libfags then
1) support a Rawlsian argument (claim that genetic advantages are undeserved and unfair, and thus enforce substantial and permanent racial preferences)?
2) still be in complete denial of reality?
3) understand that we don't owe them anything, never have, never will?
Thanks.

"So suppose the hereditarian hypothesis of the IQ gap is conclusively proven (though I don't really understand how it's not atm), and that Blacks will be, on average, dumber for the the foreseeable future."

I don't see any point to this thread. Even if this theory is proven to be correct, then what use will this knowledge be? What practical application could such results possible hold? May I ask [Reality] what the purpose of such a geneticist crusade would be, if not to provide an excuse to enact social discrimination against black's?
Imagine what would happen if such findings were proven true and released to the public. Employers would refuse to employ black people (even those who are very intelligent) based upon the false notion that they are all stupid. Although im sure you are not advocating such an outcome, I can assure you that it what would happen ('Statistics' and 'empirical evidence' are always abused in the real world).