Is the wikipedia article on Jews too long?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jews

it says there are only 13 million jews that's a long article for such a small group of people

It's so huge because wikifags suck at writing.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Who_is_a_jew
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_jews

13 million but they have more achievements than all the 5 billion+ non-White people put together. I think they merit a lengthy article.

>>4

what achievements? bringing war to the mid-east?  and don't say nobel prizes because all the non-physics nobel prizes don't mean shit.

>>5
If Nobel Prizes in chemistry, literature, economics, medicine are not significant achievements to you then what is?

The massive Jewish intellectual achievement in science, technology and arts is what I'm talking about.

>>6

everything besides physics is stamp collecting

>>7
Well your criticism is ironic because Physics is an area Jews are especially well represented in.

Linda Mack edits TOW, so what else do you expect?

>>6
The nobel prize in literature isn't important, hardly any of the prizes are given to the writers of bestsellers, just retarded poems. Also one nobel economic science prize was given to some Indian communist just because he was non-western because 95% of the prizes go to American free marketeers.

>>6
Jews have so many prizes because powerful Jews promote them and give them those prizes.

>>11
Any proof for this statement or just a (conspiracy) "theory"?

What makes you think "pro-Jewish" bias is greater than anti-Semitic bias when selecting Nobel Prize winners?

>>12
Not that guy, but you've unknowingly hit the target.
Anti-Semitic bias selection is certainly higher. People who are anti-Semites are lobbied and demonstrated against getting a Nobel prize, and it works, REGARDLESS of what they discovered.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicolae_Paulescu is a good example.
The pro-Jewish bias is obvious, and this racist asshole is a prime example: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elie_Wiesel
About scientific prizes, I could name a few recent inventors that weren't Jewish and I think deserved the prize more than the rest, but I'm biased myself.
Jews do have a higher innate intelligence than others, with a median IQ of about 110. This is certainly huge. It still doesn't mathematically explain the discrepancy...

>>13
How does religion change your genetic code?

>>13
If your 350 lb stank as momma followed a religion that said "you go to hell unless you teach your children to read and glamourise education" maybe your IQ would be triple digits aswell!

>>15
also the incorporation of music and arts in the religion, exposure to these things have shown to result in an increase of intelligence.

>>12
all the nobel prize judges are jews

>>14
>>15
Judaism is an ethnic religion. Its adherents are all (distantly) related to each other, since originally it was the religion of only one ethnic group, the Israelites.

>>16
Niggers have a long and rich musical tradition, why are they so dumb, then?

>>13
From the Wikipedia article on Elie Wiesel:
In 1955, Wiesel moved to New York City, having become a U.S. citizen: due to injuries suffered in a traffic accident, he was forced to stay in New York past his visa's expiration and was offered citizenship to resolve his status.

LOL

>>18
Jews are also the smallest most spread and diverse group, only those black jews somewhere don't have a significant amount of white genes in them and even they have a few colonial white master genes in them.