Has anyone noticed the typical response to facts is a feeble attack on someone's person. Even over the internet and in compelete objective unemotional objectivity they still think that whining about 1 tiny typo or unbacked immature slander is a valid argument! The last time I thought that I was 13.
Name:
Anonymous2007-12-31 3:04
Ron Paul loses in less than 100 hours!!!!
Name:
Anonymous2007-12-31 3:06
Has anyone
Everyone has.
More common fallacies include the reverse ecological fallacy and "cite your source" frenzy, then ad hominems to whoever source you cite to crush his argument by saying he's 'discredited.'
Name:
Anonymous2007-12-31 3:12
>>2
What does Ron Paul lose? Do enlighten us, libfag.