>>14
Not entirely.
Both of the movements have similar aims. To discourage thought and to encourage popular hatred. Towards any object of derision that is a supposed "threat to the nation". The national socialists had jews and bolsheviks, the neocons have communists and now islamic terrorists
Neoconservatism is not a intellectual movement, it is a propagandist movement perpetuated through spiralling volleys of hateful speech and prose from people like Ann Coulter who show nothing but disgust and absolute loathing for people who don't absolute agreement. The need for totalitarianist absolute agreement, is a common link that the two movements share. They both are very UNDEFINABLE idealistically, except for the fact that the two movements aimed at perpetuating greater degrees of power.
Of course, the neoconservatives are far more generous to liberty than the national socialists, especially compared to people like Hitler. Most neocons aren't that competent in their aim as him, look at Nixon for christ's sake.
In fact, I'd be willing to say that the movement itself is very passive and non-violent, and it's aim is to secure the luxury of power for the aristocratic class.