Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

How long before America attacks Iran?

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-28 15:55

Is a conflict between Iran and America inevitable at this point?

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-28 18:31

>>1
i think the question is how long till our missiles hit each other in mid air...in other words if we fight its a mutual agreement that we hate each other and want the other to fall.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-28 18:36

>>1
no.  it would also be a mistake far more disatrous than the iraq invasion - 3 times as many people, NOT a divided country.  Russia and China would also openly oppose us, using iran's military as a proxy.

btw, syria would have been a much better target than iraq.  it would secure the last openly hostile border in isreal, making it easier to kick them out of the occupied territories.  there will be no peace in the mid east before isreal at the least exits the west bank.  were I president, I would remove them myself (well, I'd have the army do it... ).

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-28 18:40

>>1
and yeh its pretty much inevitable...unfortunate but gona happen...then congress will instate the draft...shorty after syria will attack our forces in iran. Hezbollah and Hammas will push israel into a two front war. Shortly after there is the chance the entire muslim world will unite(im stepping out on a limb saying that...im just saying its a possibility...most likley wont happen.)

Now my own personal forcast for what WW III might look like after the mid east war begins:

At some point the musslims will make an attack on EU soil hence europe will step in...russia might try to step in and take the opprutinity to seize controll of as much of europe as they can. The north koreans seeing the us bogged down will attempt its take over of the orient and clash with the chinese.

All of this is my theory i am open to comments and other views and allways willing to learn and change my views if i am wrong some one may see something i dont or notice a flaw in my theory. But im pretty shure about the top part.
 

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-02 18:26

>>4 A reasonable theory, which is why we need to elect a president who won't play lap-dog to Israel (which pretty much means Ron Paul or Dennis Kucinich).

>>1 Not completely inevitable, but Americans would have to start turning off their TVs and actually caring about the real world in order to stop it from happening.

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-02 20:25

>>5
ty i spent quite some time on this theory research and such...even before iraq war...the iraq war just proved me to be right so far

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-10 3:56

LOL

I bet Iran won't unite with the rest of the Muslim world.

Iranians are Persians and they hate Arabs and Arabs hate them.

NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC TOLD ME THIS

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-10 9:26

No, Iran is moderately well developed country which engages in a significant amount of international trade, it also has engrained democratic institutions, moderate opposition to the government does not result in assassinations and so forth despite riots and other disorder. As the global capitalist hegemony displaces Iran's primitive reactionary culture it will liberalise and in 20 years it will be a lot less hostile. If Mousavi mysteriously dies then we can start worrying.

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-16 9:57

>>8
That may be true, but the bankers that control the United States government will eventually push us to a great war (or so it's been predicted), being that war is a racket of course. This is pretty much a repeat of 1929 and the 2010s will be a period of (already is actually) depression just as the 1930s were, and then came World War II.

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List