'All Whites are Racist'

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=58426

A mandatory University of Delaware program requires residence hall students to acknowledge that "all whites are racist" and offers them "treatment" for any incorrect attitudes regarding class, gender, religion, culture or sexuality they might hold upon entering the school, according to a civil rights group.
[...]
http://www.thefire.org/index.php/article/8552.html
“A RACIST: A racist is one who is both privileged and socialized on the basis of race by a white supremacist (racist) system. The term applies to all white people (i.e., people of European descent) living in the United States, regardless of class, gender, religion, culture or sexuality. By this definition, people of color cannot be racists, because as peoples within the U.S. system, they do not have the power to back up their prejudices, hostilities, or acts of discrimination. (This does not deny the existence of such prejudices, hostilities, acts of rage or discrimination.)" - Page 3

“REVERSE RACISM: A term created and used by white people to deny their white privilege. Those in denial use the term reverse racism to refer to hostile behavior by people of color toward whites, and to affirmative action policies, which allegedly give 'preferential treatment' to people of color over whites. In the U.S., there is no such thing as 'reverse racism.'" - Page 3

“A NON-RACIST: A non-term. The term was created by whites to deny responsibility for systemic racism, to maintain an aura of innocence in the face of racial oppression, and to shift responsibility for that oppression from whites to people of color (called "blaming the victim"). Responsibility for perpetuating and legitimizing a racist system rests both on those who actively maintain it, and on those who refuse to challenge it. Silence is consent." - Page 3

"Have you ever heard a well-meaning white person say, 'I'm not a member of any race except the human race?' What she usually means by this statement is that she doesn't want to perpetuate racial categories by acknowledging that she is white. This is an evasion of responsibility for her participation in a system based on supremacy for white people." - Page 8

Ouch, I wanted to add:
Prove me wrong!

No it's pretty much correct.

also http://www.worldnetdaily.com lol

Uh, that's retarded.  there is no such thing as race, we are all too geneticly similar to have races.  all humans have an inherent bias against that which they perceive as different.  thanks for trolling!

Hello >>4
In case you are White, you fit in the last quote:
"Have you ever heard a well-meaning white person say, 'I'm not a member of any race except the human race?' What she usually means by this statement is that she doesn't want to perpetuate racial categories by acknowledging that she is white. This is an evasion of responsibility for her participation in a system based on supremacy for white people." - Page 8
Racist!

Thomas Granger was one of the first people executed in Puritan New England. Granger was put to death in 1642 for having sex with a turkey.

>>5
moron troll is a moron.

How can whites be privileged if beeing white includes beeing born as a racist extremist with white guilt and responsibility for other races?

"“REVERSE RACISM: A term created and used by white people to deny their white privilege. Those in denial use the term reverse racism to refer to hostile behavior by people of color toward whites, and to affirmative action policies, which allegedly give 'preferential treatment' to people of color over whites."

LOL

BLACK POWER GRID

So being white is the new ORIGINAL SIN?

Saying all whites are racist is being racist against whites.

Very related:
http://www.campus-watch.org/article/id/1809
http://media.www.dailytexanonline.com/media/storage/paper410/news/2004/11/23/University/Survey.Reveals.Liberal.Bias.Of.Professors-814209.shtml

The articles talk about the left-wing bias on college campuses.  Interestingly, one of the articles notes the fact that the bias in colleges is least evident in the field of economics, which I find rather interesting. 

I look forward to being a racist as I'm moving to the U.S. very soon.

What she usually means by this statement is that she


written by a nigger dyke then












word "nigger" used for shock value


I am white therefore not capable of being a racist

Well if we're racist even if we are non-racist then I guess we have no choice but to become hardcore fascists.

>>13
I doubt it is only 'very related' - I think that is getting to the source of the problem - rampant leftism and political correctness on college campuses.

>>17

I don't get it, you're whining about this stuff being said on campus because of "political correctness". But in truth- no matter to what extreme you try to vilify your opposition- it can be objectively said that this is a matter of political INcorrectness, is it not?

Are you upset that this is being said at all, or are you more upset that this is being said about white people by white people? What is a "Liberal" to you, if you think this is about leftism and PC?

>>18  "But in truth- no matter to what extreme you try to vilify your opposition- it can be objectively said that this is a matter of political INcorrectness, is it not?"

I don't think this is political incorrectness.  But before we discuss this further, lets agree on what CONSTITUTES political correctness, at least for the sake of our discussion here and what the two of us have in mind when we think of the term and its meaning.  I view political correctness as simply being what will, on the whole, minimize "offense" to a given group of people - i.e. racial, cultural, sexual, etc.  In other words, what is 'offensive' would be politically incorrect imo.  Based on that, I think this could actually be considered "political correctness run amok" due to its excessive attempts to please minority communities.  I don't think this could be seen as political incorrectness because I don't see it being talked about much (if at all) in the MAINSTREAM media.  If it isn't bothersome enough a policy or action to warrant coverage by the mainstream media, it must not be offending the groups it hurts enough for them to raise a stink about it.  When you balance this out with the support of the groups whom the program would arguably benefit, the program is, on the whole, more politically correct than politically incorrect. 

While I would agree that, depending on how you define political correctness, this may not actually BE a case of political correctness, I doubt VERY MUCH if you could HONESTLY say that this has NOTHING AT ALL TO DO with leftism vs rightism or progressivism vs conservatism.  For real, this is really leftism gone off the deep end.  Conservatives don't generally support garbage like this - and generally don't even support MILD preferential treatment of a similar flavor as you see here.  Indeed, most of the complaining about things like this does indeed come from the right.  So while I may agree it could be seen as debatable as to whether or not this is a case of political correctness, I am rather convinced that it IS a case of leftism gone off the deep end, and is certainly political in nature. 

Isn't singling out a race racist in itself?

God damn crackers. That's almost as bad as Christianity, born to go to hell. Anyone who judges someone right from the bat is an ignorantfag. Someone should shoot up UoD next.

>>19

Ok, here's where we agree: In other words, what is 'offensive' would be politically incorrect imo.

You are right, what is offensive to others is "politically incorrect". Wow! Did you get out of a dictionary or off of Wikipedia or something?

Amazing.

But here's where you stop making logical sense:

"Based on that, I think this could actually be considered "political correctness run amok" due to its excessive attempts to please minority communities."

....wait, What? White people are the ones offended by this so this- objectively speaking- means that the statements made are politically incorrect. This is using the bare bone definition, here. I don't understand what could be throwing you off about my statements...

Oh wait! Is that I'm speaking objectively?

PROTIP: If you're a white "non-liberal", expressing the viewpoint of a white "non-liberal" then I can't very well expect you to think objectively or reasonably.

>>19

That's all well and good. But can you refute anything in >>1? Are you, a white male, going to tell me, another white male that there aren't certain advantages to being born white?

>>22
Being >>1, and not >>19, I can safely refute everything.

A RACIST: A non term. This term was coined by Jews (If they generalize, so shall I -- Trotsky made up the term in 1922 in a French publication whose name escapes me at the moment) to deny personal responsibility and pin it on Whitey, to maintain an aura of supposed oppression in the face of being intellectually inferior, and to shift responsibility for being intellectually inferior to Whites (called "playing the race card").

Are you, a white male, going to tell me, another white male that the advantage we get with being born White is anything other than our genes? We literately have a cultural elite and political system that *opposes* us and our interests.

>>22
I'm not >>19, I just want to cut in. I am a white male and accept that white priviledge occurs however replacing better qualified white students with black students even if it is the deep south in the 50s is downright unfair and it is used to persecute a few individuals, young people who have never had any choice to be born white or not be racist. The problem with solving white priviledge is that it is "subconscious" indirect and thus unprovable. If there is a proven instance of racism then go right ahead and prosecute the person responsible, but you can't prove a white student to be replaced by a less qualified black student is guilty of racism yet they alone are being punished for white priviledge that occurs on a national basis and on varying levels from person to person.

Affirmative action doesn't solve the problem of white priviledge, it reinforces it.

>>24
I can't believe people are actually entertaining this Marxist delusion, fuck off and die.

>>25
We must be diplomatic.

>>23

How can you say "Racist" is a "non-term" and then turn around and claim that "The White Race is genetically superior". Your logic is relentlessly flawed, in the first place. On a purely psychological level, you're the last person who should attempting to refute anything.

Listen, either "White people are the master race" or they are not. From an objectively observer, what you say qualifies any arguments against "white privileges". And if so, non-whites have the right to resist white influence. Especially, if it's a group of violent white nationalists like yourself.

Either way, the entire argument of race is a "Zero Sum" Game for mankind and western civilization.

>>24

Another comment that doesn't pan out once reason is applied. Listen: IF you "accept that white privilege occurs" THEN you prove "white privilege" exists. Do you understand? Not only do you acknowledge the existence of white privilege, but you accept it. Can you explain how that is "indirect" and "unprovable"?

>>25
Do you even know who Marx is? Because I don't think you do.

GreenTeaGirlie is proof that white women are the most attractive. she would not have been popular if she was latino or black because no one wants to see that. those people are worthless and incapable of creating high civilization like whites are. just look at america. they only destroy advanced white society. whites are becoming extinct. stop race-mixing. preserve the genetics that matter (white genetics). white, blonde-haired, blue-eyed GreenTeaGirlie is hot. resist dot com

please help put an end to this kind of intolerance

>>27
"Can you explain how that is "indirect" and "unprovable"?"
It is a collective law which declares all whites equally guilty rather than punishing individuals for crimes proven in a court of law. It is a law that punishes people for indirectly benefitting from crimes that they are unaware of rather than punishing people for actually committing those crimes.

Also I accept that it exists, however there is no way to accurately gauge the extent of it because apparently it can exist in the form of a waiter choosing to serve white patrons first or some rap artist who uses the word "nigga". I'm not sure how that convinces black students to not work as hard as they should and get lower grades as a resultbut I am prepared to accept that it exists and does have an indirect effect.

>>29

So?

White privilege punishes non-whites indirectly for resisting "crimes" committed against them in the name of white superiority. Are you saying white superiority and White privilege aren't related? Well Gee, Golly, I don't get it ^_^.

I thought you white nationalists were all about the correlation between superiority and privilege. Listen, I know you're quite hung up on blacks and rap music, but try to focus on the bigger picture here.

Why is it a crime to resist White privilege, if you are a non-white? If you are non-white, why is it so appalling that a non-white speak out against those who seek to subjugate them?

>>30
Not 29. Please tell me you are fucking trolling.

>>31

Why are you having such a difficult time refuting him?

>>32
What is there to refute? The White Conspiracy? Non-whites resisting "crimes" in the name of white superiority? WTF? Please tell me how East Asians and Jews are being mistreated, when they are a lot better off than Whites. I think it's time to talk about Jew privilege or East Asian privilege. Or it's time to talk about Whites, East Asians and Jews having the right to resist crimes in the name of black inferiority, to which crime statistics will attest.

There is no white privilege, else there wouldn't be groups like stormfront advocating segregation now would there? There wouldn't be fucking affirmative action, and there wouldn't be faggots such as the ones described by OP preaching institutionalized white guilt through a feeble White Conspiracy theory in order to account for inequality.

Also, to the faggots that lobby to get scientists out of their jobs for being "racist" despite all the data showing about the same means for certain populations, fuck you. You leftist scum are just as bad as the faggots who want to stop technological advancement because it might cause deaths.

But I'm pretty sure I had been trolled. :/

>>33

All that and you still didn't address any of the ideas presented in either posts:

Why is it a crime to resist White privilege, if you are a non-white? If you are non-white, why is it so appalling that a non-white speak out against those who seek to subjugate them? Are you saying white superiority and White privilege aren't related? 

>>34
Why is it a crime to resist White privilege, if you are a non-white? If you are non-white, why is it so appalling that a non-white speak out against those who seek to subjugate them?
It's not a crime to resist White privilege, just as it's not a crime to resist goblins, ghosts, and elves. Therefore it shouldn't be a crime to resist Zionist world domination conspiracies etc. What matters is when it all gets institutionalized and sprouted in academia.

If you are non-white, why is it so appalling that a non-white speak out against those who seek to subjugate them?
How the fuck is it so appalling that a non-White speaks out against the White Conspiracy, especially when he has leftist cheerleaders supporting him and normal people who are fence-sitters taking up this bullshit? You just asked a very non-sensical question, the equivalent of "Why is Africa so awesome?" It's not, and they're not. They speak about it all the time, the nigger leaders have the nerve to speak about White on Black crime when Black on White crime is several ten times higher. What you have is called persecution mania, much widespread in leftist cunts.

No one is subjugating non-Whites but their own intellectual inferiority. And I find neither the desire to help them in that case, as altruism in a retarded manner does not aid evolution on either side, and because it is not my burden to bear. Your moralism is useless and bullshit. If they feel subjugated, GTFO to their homelands.

Are you saying white superiority and White privilege aren't related? 

I'm saying in a normal, fair society there'd be White privilege over racial groups who have lower intelligence. There is currently no institutional White privilege, rather the opposite.  Bloated government programs hurt Whites more than anyone else.

White superiority has little to do with the non-sensical alleged White privilege, as the latter is fictional. White "superiority" has much more to do with genes than anything else, as our institutions are currently acting against our interests..

>>30
>>29 here. I never said anything about white superiority so I'm worried you might be mistaking me for the other guy. I admit my statement "waiter choosing to serve white patrons first or some rap artist who uses the word "nigga"." was a little out of hand, but I was trying to exercise the point that 99.9% of white priviledge incidents cannot be recorded or undergo any legal process so it is very difficult to gauge how much it happens and where it happens. Action against white priviledge must be directed against those who discriminate on a regular basis or it will have no effect, putting black people in a university proves nothing if the population is aware of affirmative action. A more just law for instance would be to round up hate crime convicts, make them work in labour camps to provide money to help disadvantaged people and since the majority of disadvantaged people are black due to racism it should all work out. What do prisoners do all day anyway except stab each other with soap shanks and rape each other?

>>35

You don't think persecution mania doesn't extend itself to whites as well? Moralism? You're kidding, right? I'm being objective here. America isn't your homeland, either. Fuck off back to the gray-skied tundra if you think whites have "got it bad".

Just answer the question: Why can't whites have disadvantages? (PROTIP: Because white privilege prohibits such disadvantages.)

White superiority is a belief that you adhere to because you believe in the so-called "genetic superiority" of "white people". And that's fine, if you wanna drink the Kool-Aid.

But what I'm saying is that this is the cause of white privilege. Your beliefs and your world view make white privilege a reality. The only conditions that are really needed for "white privilege" is a sentiment of "white superiority".

Once these conditions have been met, the zero sum game of race conflict truly begins. Once that happens all your crying about Affirmative Action is fucking meaningless. It's every race for itself, by any means necessary. 

Here's another statement that highlights how much you just don't "get it":

"I'm saying in a normal, fair society there'd be White privilege over racial groups who have lower intelligence.

...but we don't live in a "normal fair society". And even in a hypothetical world where the theoretical realm of "race-intelligence" is taken seriously; ethically speaking that still poses no excuse for sentiments of white privilege earned through superiority. If there are white people like you floating around, then there are going to be those "Bloated Government programs that hurt whites".

 

I'm not racist, I don't judge anyone before I meet them and talk to them.

I just hate the niggers that I meet/talk to.

ashasijnk;fbihdkn2bihknme3jbk jxbh3knjuh4879tygh4uibejkn jw

I'm not racist, I just dislike negroids.