Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Gores triumph is a measure of Bushs disrepute

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-14 0:43

this is why the conservatives are BAWWWing so much

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-14 0:46

Because what Gore says means that they can't run around with their SUVs eating beef and throwing trash out of their windows on the highway without Government intervention.

Hey Libertarians, looks like your paradigm of thought is dead.

Yeah right, the FREE MARKET and its WEALTH ACCUMULATION can ECONOMICALLY solve the problems of the environment... PSSSSSSSSh.

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-14 1:01

>>2

your writing style is so terrible, but i think this is a good point.  Libertarians have little to say about the environment other than to make vague appeals to the protection of private property.  even a ten-year-old can tell that they're spewing nothing but shit when they open their mouths.

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-14 1:19

>>3

I don't think there's anything wrong with my writing style aside from the last sentence.

I should have clarified in that there are little to no economic incentives for Libertarians to control their carbon emissions, and it is something the Government must do (via Kyoto Protocol and the EU's Carbon Currency).

Anarcho-Capitalism is going nowhere fast when someone gets a Nobel Peace Prize for advocating Environmental Policies.

This is why the Neo-Cons affiliated with heavy pollution industries are BAAAAAAAWWWWWWWWing so much.

I hope my writing style doesn't get in the way here, but I remember one Supreme Court Case called "Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife" where the SCOTUS were BAAAAAAAAAAWWWWWWWWWing over the idea that United States Corporations must be held to United States Environmental policies in places outside of United States jurisdiction (I believe the case was concerning a plant in India).

The SCOTUS inevitably ruled in favor of the fat fuck corporate pollution yes men.

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-14 3:22

There's nothing wrong with beef. I'd rather live in a country of 5 million people where I can eat beef than a country of 50 million people where we must eat a meager ration of lentils to keep ourselves barely alive and when there is a drought we all starve.

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-14 3:41

>>2

uhh yes it can. Everything would be owned by someone, and when people polluted they'd be damaging private property, so they would have to pay fines for polluting. This is their incentive to stop polluting.

simple.

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-14 12:11

>>6

but CO2 isn't pollution moron.  it's part of the natural carbon cycle.  the problem is that we're making too mush of it.  You Libertarians are the dumbest people in the country.

Name: RedCream 2007-10-14 13:48

>>6
Pay fines?  That's a riot.  Your Hypercorrupt administration and Congress wants nothing to do with enforcing the law upon corporations in America.  The existence of the Hypercapitalists alone proves that the 21st Century will be a new age of corporate lords, who will strut around the world like the robber barons of old.  They will be untouchable by law, since they will make the law, and when existing laws cross them, they will own the enforcement agencies.

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List