Apparently me politely stating in a public place that I believe homosexuality is immoral and unethical and the fact the most religions oppose it is "forcing my beliefs on others". Yet homosexuals doing things like kissing in public (I don't think it's okay for anyone to kiss in public), telling people to accept homosexuality or be labeled a "homophobe", adopting kids and brainwashing them into becoming homosexuals, and having LGBT pride marches isn't forcing beliefs.
Name:
Anonymous2007-10-10 18:43
if you dont accept homosexuality you ARE a homophobe you HOMOPHOBE^
There's no logical or rational reason why homosexuality should be considered immoral and unethical. If it weren't for homophobes "forcing their beliefs" on homosexuals for the last thousand years until present day, there would be no need for gays to tell people to "just accept homosexuality" and have LGBT marches.
I'm not intolerant, and yes: I think the stereotypes are funny considering that I'm a "victim" of some sterotypical commets.
It was a joke, now laugh or die...
Name:
Anonymous2007-10-11 2:45
It's now illegal in the UK to "incite hatred against gays" with up to 7 years jail time for it. That can include any kind of derogatory comment. And of course it was a Jew politician who pushed the law through (Jack Straw).
Ofcourse it is, Its antinatural and if you have religious beliefs such as Christianity you can see that is also against God's law and purpose, so no matter what you think, Bestiality and/or Zoophilia is wrong, is a mental deviation and Humans, and is not meant to be,
Name:
Anonymous2007-10-11 11:31
Since faggots are so scared, let's protect them from the bloodthirsty populace by interning them in concentration camps where they can live safely.
Of course it is, Its anti-natural and if you have religious beliefs such as Christianity you can see that its also against God's law and purpose, so no matter what you think, Bestiality and/or Zoophilia is wrong, is a mental deviation in humans, and is not meant to be.
If we talk about Nature, saying that bestiality is ok, they that mean that a man can have sex with a female dog and have Human puppies. We know that’s not possible because the DNA and other facts do not allow reproduction amongst these species, why? Because It would break a natural order, if you can procreate at least 1 hybrid descendant between completely different species, is because that path is blocked and is not meant to be by nature.
PROVE ME WRONG BEASTLYFAGG!!
Name:
Anonymous2007-10-11 11:47
``If we talk about Nature, saying that bestiality is ok, they that mean that a man can have sex with a female dog and have Human puppies''
wrong, sex doesn't necessarily have anything to do with the ability to reproduce.
Do you go around telling men or women who are infertile that they aren't allowed to have sex?
homosexuals are not gay. Gay is a word meaning exuberance and mirthful joy. the homosexuals i see are always complaining and are never happy.
Name:
Anonymous2007-10-11 13:15
sex without reproduction isn't sex, it's abuse of sacred organs.
Name:
Anonymous2007-10-11 16:28
do us a favor and go fuck yourself
Name:
Anonymous2007-10-11 16:55
Im gay
Name:
Anonymous2007-10-11 18:50
Bestiality isn't gay, it's hot, raw, and animalistic.
Name:
Anonymous2007-10-11 18:53
>>11
I don't give two shits about zoophiles. Let them fuck a goat for all I care. If the animal doesn't want to be fucked in the ass, they'll bite the person's cock off or something else to that extent. I think it's wrong and would would never do it (for reasons already explained in this thread, among others), but really, it's their business.
>>12
"Their's no logical or rational reason why genocide should be considered unethical or immoral"
I really hope that was an attempt at trolling. Speaking objectively, genocide is wrong because it's counterproductive to human development and goes against any form of logic. Speaking subjectively, I don't know how anyone can justify the taking of lives, let alone based on nothing but race. There's a pretty big difference between two consenting adults of the same gender having gay buttsex and wiping out an entire race.
1626 N Wilcox Ave #289
Hollywood CA 90028
+1 800 267 0495
Have fun, /b/. Put this vegan pussy faggot back where he belongs.
Name:
Anonymous2007-10-17 2:58
>>30
"Spoiler: Without homosexuals, 'straight' would not exist."
So if there were no homosexuals people would be incapable of being attracted to the opposite sex?
everyone has some gay in them and anyone who denies it is an ignorant twat
Name:
Anonymous2007-10-17 15:56
>>34
In most people it exists, but is completely negligible like the appendix. So in a loose definition of the term they are "gay", but behaviourally they are not gay.
Name:
Anonymous2007-10-18 2:52
Reading through this just proves why statements like this:
"There's no logical or rational reason why bestiality should be considered immoral and unethical." and "There's no logical or rational reason why genocide should be considered immoral and unethical."
Are fucking stupid.
Pulling from the words of other people posting, when you are having sex with animals, it's generally, ya' know, non-consentual.
Genocide involves murdering hundereds if not thousands of people.
How can you fucking equate this with a man being attracted to a man or a woman being attracted to a woman? Who are they hurting other than the people who believe that is is immoral?
If you're going to post half-assed quotes like that, can you atleast make sure there is some logical connection?