>>66
You don't really seem to get it, so this post is primarily for lulz.
This is a typical 'White guilt' propaganda piece.
What if I'm not white? Or Jewish? Or Black? Or Mexican? Or a Man?
Fallacy. Race deniers control academia and are overwhelmingly represented among the populace. The representatives themselves are obsessed with race. Liberals say "judge individually" and then propose a huge bloated nanny state to take care of negroes at the expense of everyone.
Ok, I get that this may or may not be true. But how is this relevant? 150 years ago race "embracers" controlled academia and were overwhelmingly represented among the populace. The world wasn't any better then and it isn't any better now. Or is it? What exactly are you prepared to do with this truth of yours?
What's more important is the fact that the Boasian revolution in anthropology was political and not based on science at all. You don't get it. Science is not a fucking democracy, pick and choose whatever your wishful thinking mind wants to believe is real. If you're willing to totally disregard the turning point of race and why it was retarded to do so your fucking choice. But don't do what you do in your next quote: Call racialism pseudo-science.
I wholeheartedly concur. You can't just "elect" the truth. We can play this game of allele frequencies, haplotypes, nuture vs nature all fucking day and come to 100 half-truths and people are going to still do whatever and whoever the fuck they want. Are you trying to control the genetic destiny of mankind? The effort is somewhat admirable but due to man's inner nature I don't think it's possible.
Don't need to, have a wife.
That's nice. Is she 100% white? (PROTIP: She's not and neither are you.)
To race deniers, like creationists, it is impossible to prove race. They name dissident views heretics (or pseudo-science) and think they can get away with it because they can appeal to the majority instead of answering why is it pseudo-science. Like theism, race denial is unfalsifiable for leftists. They never say what proof would prove race for them, or ask for a non-reasonable proof.
Leftists would never be satisfied with science, and will always claim the proof is not 'hard enough.' However, you never fucking post proof of racial equality, despite having asked for it ITT. Not one study.
And you still haven't scientifically addressed what's been said in posts
>>34, >>35, >>36. At all. You just vomited up more shit from "Take back America" pamphlets. When the other side provides solid arguments contrary to your beliefs you cry in the same fashion as "your enemy does" and about the exact same shit.
That's hardly a rebuttal to race, just more wishful thinking. When will you people get it? Moralism and the moral high ground (Jews introduced it in academia -- if you want I'll elaborate on that too) cannot be used to establish facts. It's an obvious bias.
I'm not "rebutting" race, cockbrain. And please don't bring Moralism into this as if you're deferring to objectivity. I highly doubt you'd still feel the way you do now if you were not white.
Well your stance is: "I don't really care about anything you post, you might be right but you're wrong and it doesn't matter. You can't be serious."
Yeah, I thought the fact that I'm basically trolling you would've been obvious from the start.
Also don't deny you're not a leftist, the second sentence you made evoking White guilt utterly exposed your school of thought.
Everything you said in this sentence is why no one in their right mind takes your type seriously.