Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Proof niggers are dumb (IQ, brain size etc)

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-23 22:46 ID:et2rELvK

Oriental populations in East Asia and North America typically have mean IQs falling between 101 to 111. White populations in Europe, South Africa, Australasia, and North America have mean IQs of from 85 to 115, with an overall mean of 100. Black populations living south of the Sahara, in the Caribbean, in Britain, and in North America, average IQs of from 70 to 90.

Especially contentious was Lynn's calculation of a mean IQ of only 70 for Black Africans living south of the Sahara. Many reviewers have expressed skepticism about such a low IQ, holding it impossible that, by European standards, 50 percent of Black Africa is 'mentally retarded'. But a mean African IQ of 70 has been confirmed in three studies since Lynn's review, each of which used Raven's Progressive Matrices, a test regarded as an excellent measure of the non-verbal component of general intelligence and one not bound by culturally specific information.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-28 15:51 ID:aI7rXGH5

>>65
>The first thing whites did when they "discovered" other races was start fucking them immediately.
This is a typical 'White guilt' propaganda piece.

>Furthermore, as many people as there are pushing for race denial there are just as many external forces pushing whites as the prime race and just as many people emphasizing the idea of race.
Fallacy. Race deniers control academia and are overwhelmingly represented among the populace. The representatives themselves are obsessed with race. Liberals say "judge individually" and then propose a huge bloated nanny state to take care of negroes at the expense of everyone.
What's more important is the fact that the Boasian revolution in anthropology was political and not based on science at all. You don't get it. Science is not a fucking democracy, pick and choose whatever your wishful thinking mind wants to believe is real. If you're willing to totally disregard the turning point of race and why it was retarded to do so your fucking choice. But don't do what you do in your next quote: Call racialism pseudo-science.

>Just take a look at the porn you beat off to.
Don't need to, have a wife.

>Finally, if anyone is in the "pseudo-science" camp, it's you guys.
To race deniers, like creationists, it is impossible to prove race. They name dissident views heretics (or pseudo-science) and think they can get away with it because they can appeal to the majority instead of answering why is it pseudo-science. Like theism, race denial is unfalsifiable for leftists. They never say what proof would prove race for them, or ask for a non-reasonable proof.

>We've been over this and you still have to hard scientific defense for statements that have made contrary to your worldview.

Leftists would never be satisfied with science, and will always claim the proof is not 'hard enough.' However, you never fucking post proof of racial equality, despite having asked for it ITT. Not one study.

>I'm sure there are people who believe as you do, but generally speaking, when comes to race people do the exact opposite. The world is too fucking small now for the views you hold.
That's hardly a rebuttal to race, just more wishful thinking. When will you people get it? Moralism and the moral high ground (Jews introduced it in academia -- if you want I'll elaborate on that too) cannot be used to establish facts. It's an obvious bias.

>Sorry?
Well your stance is: "I don't really about anything you post, you might be right but you're wrong and it doesn't matter.
You can't be serious."

By the way, how do I quote properly? Also don't deny you're not a leftist, the second sentence you made evoking White guilt utterly exposed your school of thought.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List