Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Funny Liberals

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-06 23:13 ID:Q6wp+Fil

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-06 23:46 ID:Q6wp+Fil

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-07 12:35 ID:YvbeyYyN

>>1
Lulz I hate stupid liberals as much as anyone, but in these vids the interviewer is clearly a Zionist Jew citing past crimes against Israel and Jews as justification for the war in the Middle East. Also, lol @ him trying to say Iraq had nuclear weapons and we just didn't find them.

Saddam ruled with an iron fist and killed many extremist rebels including Kurds; that's how he kept the country together. Now since he is gone the country is in a state of civil war between Sunni and Shi'ite factions. Some estimates for Iraqi deaths as a result of the war are as high at 670,000. Even the lowest death tole estimates are way in excess of the amount of people killed by Saddam. There is no moral case for the war, and more importantly there is no case for it being in America's interests.

Name: RedCream 2007-09-07 18:43 ID:Iwh3vCxf

>>3
The Liberal support for the war is why the war will simply continue until the USA has to "pull out of Saigon" in a hurry.  The Libs and Cons are well aligned with the financial incentives for continuing to attack Oil-Owning Islam.  Behind even that, there are enough Zionist Libs and Cons to firm up any loose threads of support.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-08 0:17 ID:wuL8JwL2

>>4
"Liberal" and "Conservative" or "Democrat" and "Republican"?

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-08 0:30 ID:PXR5xFt2

>>4
correct, they did it on Mythbusters

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-08 13:49 ID:RwlwwOQx

lol naive liberals

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-08 16:41 ID:b5okoVNc

>>4
wrong.

Name: RedCream 2007-09-08 17:28 ID:4ofgQrDc

>>8
Which part, and why?

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-17 8:39 ID:Ej7NcdI0

lol @ liberals

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List