Evolutions.

As we know Karl Marx had extremely poor critical thinking skills and believed one day everyone could be living in a totalitarianism and next they could be living in his unrealistic utopia, the result of a magical "revolution". As a result for 100s of years many teenagers, con artists and emofags have utilised his "ideas" to come up with the most retarded bullshit imaginable. We must realise that to walk a mile you must take many 100s of small steps, sweeping changes which are well beyond our ability to succesfully predict only result in disaster and a reversion to more primitive methods of organisation.

So. How long does it take to complete a scientific, political, philosophical, social or economic evolution?

A bee puts to shame many an architecht in the construction of its cells; but what distinguishes the worst of architects from the best of bees is namely this. The architect will construct in his imaginiation that which he will ultimately erect in reality. At the end of every labour process, we get that which existed in the conciousness of the labourer at its commencment.

100 years tops. People could easily overthrow any government, including the USA, if we rose up. Obviously the flawed system we call "Democracy" would vanish and rise into a dictatorship. This was almost acheived with Adolf Hitler, he brought the Golden Age to Germany, and if he had been able to continue his work, we probaly would have had a fitter, "better" society today just because of his standards(kinda like Sparta for new fags). Its unrealistic to think that we could acheive all aspects of evelution in human existance. If we acheive political evolution then philosophical devolution will occur, its a must. Where one thing is great, we will have a downfall, although in that case it would be much better, because we would have intelligent thinking machines instead of narrow minded tards misplacing faith. Also this is polotics, its more of a lounge thread, it has no point.

>>1
Evolution? Atleast 1 generation. "Out with the old, in with the new."

Thats not an explanation, thats a gay saying that everyone knows, add some sort of substance to your statement

>>5
LOL!
>>4 is RedCream.

>>2
>>5
I did add substance to my statement...
"sweeping changes which are well beyond our ability to succesfully predict only result in disaster and a reversion to more primitive methods of organisation."
By this I meant that people should not attempt changes beyond their ability to make succesful predictions unless the risk is acceptable, for instance in a stagnant society. Current civilisation is in a constant state of flux so such measured revolutions are unnecessary.
>>2
That's fine if an architect is designing something he is qualified to do, but if an architect attempts to design a 10 mile high tower without further research it is extremely unlikely that he will succeed.
>>3
I disagree with pretty much everything you have just said. For example the evolution of one aspect does not necessarily degrade another.
>>4
What do you mean by a generation? Baby boomers were born during world war 2, but what about those born in 1938 and 1946? Are they any more or less baby boomers? What about those born in 1947-1948-1949 etc.. and 1937-1926-1935 etc..?
>>6
Why "LOL!"?

Nothing can satiate my mouth's hunger for nigger semen.

This WAS a good thread, then /b/tatds came and ruined it

Pol Pot was able to change the Cambodian society in little over a year, mainly due to the support of the army. So it is possible for a society to change quickly. Whether these can could be considered evolution is depends on how the society changes.

>>10
It is possible to change an entire country quickly, but only to a more primitive level. Pol Pot may have claimed he created a utopia, but really the power structure was much the same as a tapestry of brutal warlords and their warriors loosely affiliated with a monarch who claimed to be a pious christian. It was a tapestry of brutal generals and their gunmen loosely affiliated with a chairman who claimed to be a good communist.

Marx once said religion was the opium of the masses, he obviously didn't have the insight to realise that at the heart of all mysticism is emotion based conjecture, whether it's the belief your leaders are divine or the belief that your leaders are unquestionable.

STOP OUR FASCIST GOVERNMENT
ON WEDNESDAY SEPTEMBER 5TH 2007 STAND AND FIGHT
PAINT SIGNS BLACK...
TIP EVERYTHING POSSABLE....
EGG EVERYTHING...
DESTROY THE GOVERNMENT....
AND PASS THE WORD! POST THIS POST EVERY WHERE HUMANLY POSSABLE..
NOW GO!