Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Raping children should be illegal.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-27 1:58 ID:jAcbV3Jx

I don't know about all these democrats, NAMBLA members and liberals stating they believe it is ok to rape children. Indeed we shouldn't be afraid of change, but I think we should stick to tradition in this instance.

Name: RedCream 2007-08-27 2:03 ID:aXiEmnyk

>>1
FAIL#1:  CITATION REQUIRED.
FAIL#2:  RAPE ALREADY ILLEGAL.
FAIL#3:  UNDERAGE SEXUAL CONTACT ALREADY ILLEGAL.


Shit, you're a dumbfuck!

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-27 3:23 ID:jAcbV3Jx

>>2
I never said it was not illegal, I clearly stated I knew it was a "tradition" and that this "tradition" should not be ended.

Name: RedCream 2007-08-27 14:32 ID:mU3BYxfl

>>3
FAIL:  CITATION REQUIRED.

List the Democrats and liberals who state they "believe it is ok to rape children", and that further they are advocating that the law against such activities should be changed.

NOTE! : Advocating changing the age of majority is NOT the same as advocating child rape.  Any claim you make to that end will be summarily rejected as "fucking stupid".

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-27 15:02 ID:FmVhvqSx

>>1
fail, qoute "Raping children should be illegal." end quote

- it is illigal dickshit or cunt.

- NAMBLA etc. say they believe in sex with children, not rape. Even if they did SAY rape it falls under freedom of speech. If they WERE raping children they would be arrested.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-27 21:32 ID:Heaven

freedom of speech
highly overrated

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-28 11:02 ID:hCw3CuTi

Negros like to molest children


Dem Childrenz iz fuckin hot - Rev Al Sharpton

Name: Gorden Brown 2007-08-30 10:11 ID:5p4XeliB

Fucking children is ilegal? You could of fooled me. Me and my mate Tony Blair molest kids all the time.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-30 10:17 ID:pbSX9y72

Children who engage in sexual activity are much more susceptible to STDs, and social and pathological problems.

I say, make sex completely illegal to those whose bodies have yet to stop growing.

We're putting microchips in computers to limit information. Why not embed microchips in peoples genitalia which causes agonizing pain when kids engage in sexual contact?

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-30 10:48 ID:vajw0Nnb

>>9
Sexual activity encompasses masturbation aswell as sexual activities with other people. Masturbation is harmless.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-30 18:24 ID:43AHRaey

9 is chating a load of shit. I had Sexual activity with boys my own age between the ages of 10 and 12. I didnt catch STD or get any pathological problems.

What is unnatural is the way boys are restrained from having sex with older woman.

Name: RedCream 2007-08-30 22:39 ID:jk1YJmOX

>>9
A man reaches full adult strength in his 30s.  If you think you're going to keep his cumshots bottled up until then, you're deranged.

your attitude is the typical American one that is so uptight about sex that a lot of social problems result.  Promote birth control and stop demonizing kidsex.  Of course, your religitards (Christianazis) will never accept that.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-31 2:33 ID:0Gv4rczh

>>11
Well that was because you both agreed to it. In 99.9% of cases of adults having sex with children the adult coerced or fooled the child into making decisions they would not have wanted to do. If you grabbed a child and paraded some of the adults they know naked in front of them and asked them "do you want to stick any of these guy's pee pees into your mouth or poo hole or have any of their fat sweat asses in your face?" they will all say no, I guarantee it.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-31 5:53 ID:sI4s4slD

>>2
FAIL#1: OMG RLY?

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-31 7:00 ID:JHeJz5mn

>>12 A man reaches full adult strength in his 30s.
ha ha ha
Don't talk when you don't know anything.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-31 9:27 ID:0Gv4rczh

>>15
He has sucked many men's cocks >>15. I would not second guess him in this particular matter.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-31 13:28 ID:8WdPYtlV

I am not saying kids want to go with a adult, but to say kids having sex with boys or girls there own age causes problems is wrong. 

In fact I got a lot of issue with the female gender due to the fact I was unnaturally denyed them for too long.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-31 16:42 ID:0Gv4rczh

>>17
It causes underage pregnancy and most teenagers aged 13-15 don't have the maturity to handle any relationship properly let alone a sexually intimate relationship.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-31 18:36 ID:91NunvR4

>>18
Ever heard of protection? What's wrong with healthier teenagers?

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-01 2:30 ID:a13J8yg/

I don't know about all these republicans, NRA members and conservatives stating they believe it is ok to kill black people. Indeed we shouldn't be afraid of change, but I think we should stick to tradition in this instance.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-01 5:56 ID:VeIKg1YT

penis goes in child??? NAH!! OH HARRY U SLAY ME!!!! HAHAHAHAR!!!!

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-01 7:02 ID:IwmqtBUZ

>>19
It doesn't work all the time and the consequences are greater for a 13 year old than an adult, thus the risk is unnacceptable.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-01 9:11 ID:joYEHemD

Pedo's need 3 large potatos shoved up their arses to get an idea of size ratio.

Name: uanime5 2007-09-01 18:48 ID:jVowtUFD

>>18 Abstance only programs cause teen pregnancies since they don't tell kids about condoms.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-02 7:45 ID:PYA8T89E

RedCream, STFU, you don't know shit, don't talk then.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-02 8:33 ID:x5oLYHfH

It is illegal. Not like we're from Utah.

Of course, laws can change.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-02 14:05 ID:rssE2zhT

>>18
Your talking a load of crap. ITS PERFECTLY NATURAL FOR KIDS TO HAVE SEX WITH KIDS THERE OWN AGE.

All this crappy talk about being mature enough to handle a relationship is rubbish.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-02 14:47 ID:I21wBIMC

>>27
No it isn't. I had a crush on this girl when I was 11, but I never even thought about kissing her or anything I just wanted to be with her.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-02 15:45 ID:2aWKgpYY

STOP OUR FASCIST GOVERNMENT
ON WEDNESDAY SEPTEMBER 5TH 2007 STAND AND FIGHT
PAINT SIGNS BLACK...
TIP EVERYTHING POSSABLE....
EGG EVERYTHING...
DESTROY THE GOVERNMENT....
AND PASS THE WORD! POST THIS POST EVERY WHERE HUMANLY POSSABLE..
NOW GO!

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-03 17:01 ID:fbnTg309

>>28

Well that is you then. I know I was ready from the age of 12 for sex.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-03 17:35 ID:B3Y6ibW6

>>30
No you weren't. You're just making shit up to sexualise children. Sexual development is a slow process which can affect someone psychologically for the rest of their life. Society ensures children are only exposed to sex incrementally as they get older so they can learn how to handle the strong emotions involved.

Tell me about your mother.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-03 19:10 ID:IV/fpLEj

>>27
Have you seen teh movie Kids? http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0113540/

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-03 21:21 ID:MgaGGsjC

>>1
wrong.

Name: RedCream 2007-09-03 22:49 ID:M6WL902I

>>31
The line drawn at 18 (or less than 18, depending on the age differential between 2 consenting people) in the USA is an arbitrary one.  People are still "sexually developing" well into their 20s.  You should learn not to "make shit up", yourself.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-04 12:00 ID:GpTQ1E1Q

>>34
Think RedCream. Sexual development is an ongoing process, a person first learns when it is appropriate to hug and kiss and be hugged and kissed, then to grope and sleep with someone in their underwear etc... By the time someone is 18 they are still sexually developping, but they have developped past the point where they can make mature decisions about sex. At age 18 most people are finnishing off their sexual development, for instance when I was 18 I didn't know how turned on I could get by big beautiful women but I certainly knew the proper procedure for getting laid without being charged with rape or indecent exposure.

Name: RedCream 2007-09-04 14:00 ID:cN/54VoD

>>35
I have thought about it.  I said the line drawn at 18 is arbitrary ... and it is.  You are still assuming that people become mature about sexual decisions.  Some attain that at 16.  Others never attain it.  From even casual observation, mature sexual decisions are largely avoided for most of your 20s.  Shouldn't the line then be drawn at 28?

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-04 14:25 ID:GpTQ1E1Q

>>36
Unless someone is sufferring from mental illness or psychological abuse you can be sure everyone is sexually mature enough to decide when they want sexual intercourse at the age of 18.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-04 16:10 ID:r7eR7Ikg

>>34
         ∧_∧   / ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄
          ( ´∀`) < vete a chingar a tu puta madre puto!
        /    |    \
       /       .|      ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄
       / "⌒ヽ |.イ |
   __ |   .ノ | || |__
  .    ノく__つ∪∪   \
   _((_________\
    ̄ ̄ヽつ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ | |

Name: RedCream 2007-09-04 16:34 ID:++Wl2a/r

>>37
Learn to read, to wit:

From even casual observation, mature sexual decisions are largely avoided for most of your 20s.

No, the line drawn at 18 is arbitrary and a strong case exists that sexual maturity actually occurs for the majority in their 20s.  Of course, the line has to be drawn somewhere.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-04 17:07 ID:r7eR7Ikg

>>39
NARUTO WILL DO THE SEXY NO JUTSU AND THEN LUFFY´S DICK WILL STRECTCH TO ETERNITY AND THEY WILL MAKE LOVE TO EACH OTHER AND LUFFY WILL LOOSE BECAUZ HE WILL BE SO EXAUSTED FROM FUCKING NARUTO IN SEXY NO JUTSU THAT HE COULD BARELY MOVE AND THEN NARUTO WOULD TRY TO KILL LUFFY BUT HE WOULD BE IN LOVE WITH HIM
SO THEY WILL MARRIED AND LIVE HAPPILY EVER AFTER


Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List