Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

i got no problem executing pedos

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-26 19:13 ID:wWhgu1zn

They keep trying to argue "it's natural to be attracted to a twelve-year-olds and if you deny that you're a liar."   What kind of bullshit logic is that?  When I look at a 12-year-old, I see a kid and nothing else. 

Sick fucks.  At the very least we should tattoo their foreheads. 

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-26 19:35 ID:7sL6r7cM

>When I look at a 12-year-old, I see a kid and nothing else.

Usually, I see a kid and the clothes that the kid is wearing. Is that not the case for you as well?

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-26 19:39 ID:wWhgu1zn

>>2

oh my!  a pedo playing semantics?  How could I have been so blindsided?  Good show, my despicable fellow, good show!

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-26 20:05 ID:9LEjC3VV

>>3
Is playing semantics any worse than what you're doing?

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-26 20:15 ID:wWhgu1zn

yes

Name: RedCream 2007-08-26 22:22 ID:JQ9Hv2x+

>>1
Well, make sure you make the tattoo a six-sided star.  Why avoid what worked in the 1930s?

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-26 22:24 ID:v7Gocf0V

>>6
Pedos are criminals, jews aren't. At least that's my opinion, it may not be yours. We'll use a corrupted logo one of their organisations used.

Name: RedCream 2007-08-26 22:34 ID:JQ9Hv2x+

>>7
EPIC FAIL.  The Nuremburg Laws expressly made Jews criminals and second-class citizens in Germany in the 1930s, by de-naturalizing and de-legitimizing many of their common practices and rights.

Pedos are criminals in this nation, true, but they still have rights, and the concept of "cruel and inhuman punishment" well applies in their case with respect to your sentiments.  However, the pedos are your Jews, so you don't want to fucking hear anything about THAT, do you, Nazi?  Eat a dick.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-26 22:42 ID:vCXb/bgH

I'm a pedo.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-26 22:46 ID:v7Gocf0V

>>8
The death penalty is neither cruel or inhuman.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-26 22:47 ID:O6cNRNwG

Adults have been sexually attracted to young teens since forever. It wouldn't make sense evolutionary speaking if they didn't. Are you a creationaist perhaps? As soon as kids are able to reproduce, they're fair game. It is only since the last 100 years in the industrialized west that having sex with young teens is frowned upon. Why, I do not know. Perhaps because young teens are kept stupid. People used to found families at the age of 12 in th past.
Hell, even more and more 20 year olds remain childish and live a life without any responsibilities.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-26 22:53 ID:v7Gocf0V

Children have been sent to work in the salts mines since forever. It wouldn't make sense unethically speaking if they didn't. Are you a libertarian perhaps? As soon as kids are able to work, they're fair workers. It is only since the last 100 years in the industrialized west that brutal oppressive child labour is frowned upon. Why, I do not know. Perhaps because young teens are kept stupid. People used to found work camps purely for under 12s in the past.
Hell, even more and more 20 year olds remain childish and live a life without any responsibilities.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-26 22:57 ID:O6cNRNwG

>>12

Why would child labour be any more "brutally oppressive" than adult labour, huh?

pwned, ageist scum

Name: RedCream 2007-08-26 23:26 ID:JQ9Hv2x+

>>10
Your statement falls into the realm of "opinion".  There is great precedent in the law for considering execution (and at least tattooing) cruel and inhuman.  Several states in the US don't do it for those reasons.  Those who do have generally moved on, using injections since electrocution was considered ... waaaaait for it! ... cruel and inhuman.

So it looks like you're a bit on the side of the odd-duckery.  That's OK, since it's legal to be a fucking barbarian in the US.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-27 0:40 ID:e5e2JzCe

Only if we can shove 4 large Idaho potatos up their asses first.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-27 1:27 ID:HAJcSGQa

>>13
The same levle of labour for an adult is brutally oppressive to a child.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-27 3:22 ID:sLx2R69X

>>16

And the same level of labour for a man is brutally oppressive to a woman.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-27 3:50 ID:HAJcSGQa

>>17
No it isn't.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-27 3:51 ID:HAJcSGQa

>>17
So you're a sexist aswell as a child rapist. Was your father a wife beating faggot paedophile or something?

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-27 4:02 ID:sLx2R69X

>>18
>>19

Oh yeah, cuz women are just as physically strong as men.
Was your mother a tranny or something?

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-27 4:48 ID:8VirbSAQ

Once the tits start to grow and they get bloodloss it means they are ready to have children.

Nature made it so that men want to fuck almost everyday for a couple of times.

1+1= 2

it's society that made it morally wrong, not nature itself.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-27 4:48 ID:e5e2JzCe

>>21
We're humans. Not fucking animals. Maybe you are though...?

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-27 5:09 ID:HAJcSGQa

>>21
Once emotions start to surfae and they get bloodlust it means they are ready to commit murder.

Nature made it so that men want to fight and kill almost everyday for a couple of times.

1+1= 2

it's society that made it morally wrong, not nature itself.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-27 5:41 ID:8VirbSAQ

>>22
we ARE animals with a better developed brain. If we weren't animals we wouldn't have instincts. Our instincts and brain is what made humans superior. I regret it that people tend to push away those instincts. Also i never said i approve rape or not; so calling me an animal is a conclusion you drew too fast.

>>23
yup, what's your point? You just proved that my statement was correct. It's nature vs. society in this debate.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-27 7:11 ID:HAJcSGQa

>>24
"yup, what's your point? You just proved that my statement was correct. It's nature vs. society in this debate."

o.o

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-27 7:14 ID:Heaven

>>24
o.0

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-27 7:26 ID:u0pXA4M6

>>25
>>26
same fag

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-27 7:30 ID:e5e2JzCe

>>27
FAIL!

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-27 8:56 ID:6geBvtLd

Pedos = Failer of a human  => no reason to live on => justified to annihilate them!

So if i would know some of them i will beat the shit out of them.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-27 9:06 ID:8VirbSAQ

>>29
your dad

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-27 9:47 ID:fUkAQnIg

You do realize that if you executed all pedos, 4chan would dissapear due to lack of userbase, right?

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-27 14:17 ID:3oy6/swb

>>31

OP here.  there would still be enough of us - those pure, unblemished diamonds in the rough

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-27 19:23 ID:e5e2JzCe

>>32
My gun is shinier.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-27 20:56 ID:boMPbtcs

>>32 NO SUCH THING

on the other hand, they probably can't help the way they feel, but theres no real crime until someone acts on it

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-27 21:24 ID:rxNA4Rcc

>>31
4chan would dissapear
I'm on board; let's roll.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-27 21:45 ID:toqbEwwi

>>34
Tell that to the guy who got a restraining order for running a pedo website.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-28 0:34 ID:UfhYjjgC

>>36
Tell that to the children who were raped, molested and humiliated by stank sweaty ass pedos in order to produce the porn.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-31 3:07 ID:DgYJsksO

>>36
>>37 see, thats acting upon it and not keeping it to yourself. thats worth an ass beating

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-31 3:17 ID:xIOXlTIw

>>38
Depends on the act.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-31 4:13 ID:DgYJsksO

>>38  hmmm.... I suppose, but if it hurts children in a psychological manner its not worth doing

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List