One of the most watched movies of 2007 is the film 300. It chronicles the inspiring, sacrificial courage of one the greatest heroes in the history of the West, Spartan King Leonidas in his epic battle at Thermopylae against the Persian invasion of Greece in 480 BC. However, there is a dark and sinister side to the film. A close examination of this blockbuster movie affords a perfect look into how Jewish extremists use race to manipulate Americans to war for Israel, war against every true American interest. Frank Miller, the author of 300, speaks in an interview about the Jewish creation of a golem who strikes down the enemies of Zion. Here are his revealing words:
Frank Miller, shown here.
Comics can affect culture by allowing the world in, reflecting what we see. There is a reason, Miller says, that most of the great comics heroes were created by Jewish people that lived through the early part of the century. To a certain extent, they were creating a golem, a hero they needed to exist. Their comics were frank-miller-snoz.jpga response to the times they lived, something that comics have largely gotten away from and need to return if they’re going to be a significant voice in modern culture. …
The harsh truth is that we’re facing an enemy that keeps telling us what they are and what they want,” declared Miller, adding that people refuse to believe it. “They have made it plain they want to exterminate the Jews, to bring down the West, to achieve world dominion,” Miller warned, likening Islamic extremists to the Nazis in the 1930s. …
He pointed out that all of the major superheroes of the 1940s were created by Jews during a time of anti-Semitic persecution: “Superman was a golem.” … Miller nonetheless issued a call to his fellow comics pros: “Let’s revive our tradition and get back on the job.” quoted from Publisher’s Weekly
I care, but for a different reason. I'd like them to have solidarity with one another and put the caliphate system to rest and just opt for secular sunni governments.
Why do I wish this goal? Well, a pan-arabia would have a lot of benefits... let me detail them for you.
1. Homogeneity = no conflict = good economics
2. Jews get pushed out of Israel
Name:
Anonymous2007-07-03 19:51 ID:O7eolhzy
>>5
too bad those jews control aipac and all the 'superpatriots' who control your shitty country!
You're on the caliphate system (Shia), why not forge a peace with the Sunni and smash the Jews? Ahmadinejhad should befriend the Sunnis in SA/North Africa/Yemen/Oman/Syria/Iraq/Kuwait and use the pan arab solidarity to push the zionists to the sea.
Name:
Anonymous2007-07-04 2:06 ID:5L3nxzep
America should go back to relative isolationism, minus trade of course.
That would make sense for the vast majority of Americans.
You know what... since Ahmadinejhad is a big believer that the 13th Imam will return within his lifetime, that isn't very unlikely. Only problem is... he is not an Arab or a Sunni but a Persian and a Shiite. Anyone who knows anything about the friction between the two knows that if you put a Sunni and a Shiite Muslim in the same room they will eventually try to kill each other. So he may forge a temporary peace to achieve his Israeli prize... but then he will cleanse his land for it's rightful Persian owners and his precious 13th Imam. This man is a danger to the entire region.
Name:
Anonymous2007-07-04 14:55 ID:qiV/VjNA
>>13
>Anyone who knows anything about the friction between the two knows that if you put a Sunni and a Shiite Muslim in the same room they will eventually try to kill each other.
No, actually in secular Arab governments both of those groups get along nicely. They did in Iraq, but when the instability comes around they start grabbing for power (like GW1 and GW2).
I'd like to see Israel gone and then after that, the Shia removed and Sunni/Secular emphasis is made so collaboration with the west could be had.
Israel has to go, they're pulling the western hemisphere in an eastern problem. AIPAC and their lobby groups are too strong, and they rely on playing the victim too much. These victims had their chance at peace, as did the surrounding states but Israel insisted on continuing the conflict and giving Arabs offers that reek of stereotypical jewery.
Israel insists it's the "good guy" when its the instigator. It silences critics by calling them Jew haters and anti-semitics and calling them Nazis.
This will only make the Jews more enemies, and rightfully so.
Name:
Anonymous2007-07-04 16:19 ID:r71OXmYq
>>14
Yes... but Iran is neither secular nor Arab... but theocratic and Persian... so my point as far as Iran goes stands.
Name:
Anonymous2007-07-04 16:33 ID:qBieliOe
>>15
They get points for not being Arab, but they lose points for being Muslim. White Person + Islam = Brown Person.
You should listen to Hal Turner's arguments and see if they hold merit to your experiences with minorities/Jews, sometimes he makes some good observations... Racism wouldn't thrive if its premises were completely invalid.
Name:
Anonymous2007-07-05 0:24 ID:aAda6LEG
>>20
Hal is lulz fest. Nothing more. His ignorance, more importantly his impotent anger, make him a lulzipoluza.
Besides that? He's not worth the fucking time of day...
Name:
Anonymous2007-07-06 1:02 ID:38fNxSaJ
Zoroastrianism was almost as great as orange soda.
>>7
fuck the caliphate system, i'm a persian nationalist.
we should rightly own all of current iran, azerbaijan, most of iraq, afghanistan, turkmenistan, and tajikistan.
in all those areas except maybe western iraq people speak different dialects of the same language.
we have been successfully conquered through division and this trend will continue thanks to everybody who has oppressed us- which has so far included the mongols, arabs, the anglo-american elite, and of course the zionists.
>>27 You would probably still own it if you weren't so fucking stupid.
Name:
Anonymous2007-07-09 11:25 ID:UGNGaK/C
True, but 300 is also one of the most pro-white movies to ever come out of Hollywood.
Name:
Anonymous2007-07-09 14:50 ID:Br+sVggc
>>30
Its racism is symptomatic though, it has to be built on fucking lies. The spartans were pedo faggots who had so much slaves that the thing they feared the most was slave revolt, hence all the military training and stuff. It was facism in its purest form, without culture, scientific advancement nor humanity. The spartans hadnt even discovered coinage ffs! But they make fine heroes now, when the spectre of global threat has to be drummed up so the war machines can go ever on... Feh, when will we know peace everlasting?
Name:
Anonymous2007-07-09 14:52 ID:GgpOcL67
>>31
Peace is a far greater threat to humanity than war.
There is nothing wrong with fascism.
Name:
Anonymous2007-07-09 15:00 ID:Br+sVggc
>>32
6 millions jews and an awful lot of russians disagree...
>>35
No one cares about you. And, if facism was superior to communism they would not have been owned by the russians through superior strategy. No, once again it was proven that the most cunning warriors are not found among the blonde muscle bound, but among the lanky slavs. Feel free to be embarresed.
moar liek superior numbers, disregard for their own citizens, and a home field advantage.
Name:
Anonymous2007-07-09 20:06 ID:Br+sVggc
>>38
Ever heard of the T-34 or General Zhukov? Read moar history.
Name:
Anonymous2007-07-11 18:38 ID:9ISV6yWY
Too bad the OP is too stupid to realize this movie is based off an old comic book.
You fail for being >>A<< idiot.
Name:
Anonymous2007-07-11 20:14 ID:9ISV6yWY
Bump on this important subject.
Name:
Anonymous2007-07-16 7:27 ID:UTw7ih23
>>33
You could also add a helluva lot of non-jewish europeans...
Name:
Anonymous2007-07-18 23:27 ID:2GJLAlvw
I loved the movie. Ya, it was an interpretation of a graphic novel, but hey, it was interesting. And much quicker and less rambling than Herodotus' account. But I do have a few questions.
The Germans are portrayed as wild eyed savages in the battle scene of Gladiator. Did the director wish to portray Latin superiority over the Germans? (fuck the Allemani!)
Would a movie about Spartacus, if filmed from the Roman perspective, advocate slavery and, in the end, the mass crucifixion of slaves?
There's talk of a movie about Hannibal Barca. Will that be racist against whites/Europeans? I mean I love the whole Barca clan, from Himilcar to Hasdrubal, but I'd hate to see Numidians and Poenici portrayed as blood thirsty savages.
Does Last of the Mohicans appeal to the natural white-man desire for Manifest Destiny?
Do old WWII movies advocate racism against the Japanese?
Was there this kind of outrage over the movie Alexander?
Iesu Christi, people. We're not talking about "The Birth of a Nation," we're talking about a highly stylized view of an historic event. It's not like the movie is just filled with lies. The Greeks did own the Persians, at Marathon, at Thermopylae, and so on. Xerxes was a coward. Darius was a bitch. Cyrus...wasn't so bad. Good god, the Persians never could hold Greece and it only took 40,000 Macedonians and Greeks to kick the life out of Persia.
So if a movie shows Persians getting bitch slapped, I'm all for it.
Name:
Anonymous2007-07-19 1:41 ID:DHviXlKL
"the 300" was actually pretty close to real life, the only real differences were the theaterisation of the dialogue, the language and the costumes.
Name:
Anonymous2007-07-19 4:02 ID:tgw47Kz4
>>44
Yeah, and persia had a cave-troll. Fuck, i just fell for a obvious troll, sorry lol.
The utterly amazing thing here is that the modern model for Xerxes in the film/gnovel "300" is George W. Bush, the Drooling Emperor. The West (i.e. Persia) wants Greece (i.e. the oil states of Afghanistan, Iraq and Iran) to bow down to them and pay tribute to their cultural supremacy. The oil states haven't reached their Hot Gates yet, but they will ... and it'll probably involve another bottleneck like OIL.
Zionism is destroying the West. They should disconnect from it and wash their hands of the entire Jew-Arab Millennial War.
#50, a lot of war does devolve to opposing forces instead of a moral right vs. a moral wrong, yes, but that's not what I said. Whatever the film/gnovel "300" meant to you is irrelevant; it still stands as true that the modern model for Xerxes is George W. Bush (the Boy King). Bush-Xerxes' assault on Iraq-Greece is a pure attack and the Iraqis-Greeks have every justification to kill American-Persian soldiers since it is a clear case of self defense. It's all the same atrocity in motion ... you cockthroater.
Oho! Thank you, #51. Like I said, imitation is the most sincere flattery. I'm quite honored to have people admire my postings so much that they strive to imitate them. I look forward to continued flattery. {blush}
Actually, #54, slavery was an economic throwback that steadily became too expensive, disallowing the Old South to survive competition with the Old North. Alas, the Old North helped to discover that a mass of freemen -- suitably poor -- was cheaper for businesses to make use of. The end result was as Upton Sinclair documented and sensationalized.
So, slavery was not a "good thing" except for a minority of the slaves, since it provided them a strong level of security in light of their lack of use for liberty in the first place. Please note the same thing applies today to a significant portion of the US lower class, which constantly seeks security over the perils and rewards of liberty.
#58, abortions well after the 100th trimester are strongly discouraged by law enforcement officers. However, you could lobby your legislature to legalize such efforts. Be sure to CC: us the letters to your reps, here.
As your mentor, I've very happy about your urge to indulge in sexual diversity, RedCream#60/9ft7J29Q. That fulfills the American goal of increasing individual liberty. Just remember that AIDS is very transmittable via anal sex. So, be safe and have fun.
Wha, #62? RedCream#60/9ft7J29Q and I are not the same person. I was just recognizing his sexual liberties. I just happen to not be a cockswallower ... but there's nothing wrong with it in the first place.
The op found a michal moore esk idiot who thinks he is god and all knowing. Did you know xerxes is the possible the fable king that freed the jews from the babblonians and commanded the rebuilding of the temple in israel. Hmmm makes sense there we would make the persians look bad after sending us home.
#64 shows that not only is my name "RedCream" worthy of imitating, but so are my terms ("cockswallower"). The flattery only continues!
Name:
Captain Obvious2007-07-23 3:47 ID:RvEa/Fu7
>>66
excuse me. But you are aware that these imitations show off what a total douche you are, right?
Name:
Anonymous2007-07-23 3:50 ID:EX3XTxlk
>>67 he seems to be very arrogant, but that could just be me.
Name:
Anonymous2007-07-23 4:16 ID:xoSwvhmO
>>52
Gotta disagree. While similarities could be drawn between Bush and Xerxes, there is one major difference. After Thermopylae, Xerxes fled ran away from victory like filth. Bush is either too proud or too stupid.
The modern situation is more like Trajan's war against Dacia, or Genseric/Attila against the Eastern Empire: in both cases, both sides committed a long series of irreconcilably stupid mistakes and acts of aggression; and arrogance or the superpower mentality didn't help matters.
We are not without provocation: simply without a sound justification. Bella matribus dolorosa.
Name:
Anonymous2007-07-23 5:47 ID:gXTq012n
>>69
The US are the victims and the terrorists are the oppressors.
#70, it's a difficult sell to the world that you're "being oppressed" when your boot is constantly on an Iraqi throat. I'm sure your logic flies on Limbaugh, O'Reilly, and in every American Legion hall across America, but the fact of the matter is quite to the contrary. Bush and his cabal of Neo-Cons took a well-reasoned military action against Al Qaeda and then expended 10 times more effort to invade and occupy Iraq without justification.
There's a Saigon-esque retreat in the US's future. It can only logically follow since it can't conquer what it invaded in the first place. It hasn't established the rule of law since it has only enabled chaos across Iraq. IEDs are blowing American soldiers to shit since they are occupying Iraq just to keep the oil flowing and sold in dollars. Like, duh-fucking-DUH, Mr Dimwit.
Name:
Anonymous2007-07-23 11:27 ID:gXTq012n
>>71
So if a black woman uses pepper spray to defend herself from a white skinhead rapist the white skinhead is the victim?
#72, your metaphor contains the threat of rape, which is exactly what America has done to Iraq in reality. Iraq (the black woman) can't possibly victimize the US (the white skinhead rapist) when it tries to stop the rape. So the answer is "no".
I really don't understand your tone since it didn't match the metaphor. Are you sure you're posting in the right thread?
Name:
Anonymous2007-07-23 13:43 ID:gXTq012n
>>73
Iraq didn't give back the WMDs we gave them in the 80s to defend themselves against Iran. After the war in Afghanistan the risk of them selling these weapons to terrorists was real. Clearly the US was about to be violated and merely defended itself.
You complaining about the sufferring in Iraq is like you complaining about the sufferring of a white skinhead rapist with a face full of mace. You are a sexist racist ignorant hick who needs to go back to his trailer, shut the fuck up and bang his sister like the white trash piece of shit you are!
It's interesting you mention Saigon because although I was never alive in 1974/75, I see the same things being said now that was being said around 1970/1971 in the media. Looking back at old news reels from the time, I see one thing that's being said now, and that's "The ______ need to fight their own war" in Vietnam it was "The SVA need to defend their own country and fight the war" and now it's "The Iraqi Government needs to fight their own war"
The problem in 1970/71 and in 2007 is that the wars were never really in the hands of the people in these states, it was America v. Anti-Western Interests and when they start to gain ground, America doesn't want to be seen as weak so American pundits blame the loss on the American friendly over there.
#74, it's true that the American military establishment knew Iraq had WMDs of some kind since we had our shipping invoices that proved it. (In other words, the "Black woman" gave the "White skinhead rapist" a knife so that he could rape, cut and kill other bitches.)
In 1990/1, the White skinhead rapist named Irwin Racc (I.Racc) then went a little too far and raped the shit out of a Black woman (named Kulinda White (whose nickname was Ku-White)) who was a fairly good friend of the original Black woman. That started the "Coalition of the Black Bitches" in "Operation Dickhead Storm" and they put the appropriate smackdown on Irwin. They kicked down his door and chased him into his bedroom, where he was holed up with his knives, spare cash, hooch and of course piles of pornographic magazines.
Through the closed door, the "Coalition of Black Bitches" reached a deal with Irwin. He was left alone, but he had to give up his knives, and he could fap to his porn all he wanted.
So, time passed and Irwin remained in his room. Without his knives, he began to feel sullen and powerless. He spent more time fapping than exercising, and so he became flabby and pasty. Irwin got into a fairly sad shape, and started to think about selling his huge pron collection on eBay instead of locally. (Note that this angered the locals who depended on getting his cheap porn.)
Cue 2003. A huge Black woman named Georgia Wilma Bushington took some sort of strange affront to guys like Irwin, since a few rowdy neighborhood kids turned over her shitty Chevy Nova and burned it. Saying she was sure all the White skinhead rapists were responsible for her burned car, she went on a rampage, and as the very Earth thundered beneath her huge weight, she kicked down an apartment door nearby where a known rapist (Oscar Lopez) was said to have spent the night on occasion. Chaos ensued and the police refused to interfere.
Soon, Georgia Wilma Bushington great incensed at the lack of progress against all White skinhead rapists like Oscar and Irwin, so she collected together more Black women. She gained an important ally in another, fat Black woman named Antonia Blarrington, despite her history of distributing illegal guns in the 'hood. Again, shaking the Earth with their great, combined weight of disgusting suet, they proceeded directly to the door of the original (now quite flabby and disarmed) White skinhead rapist, Irwin. They stormed into his apartment, screaming incoherently about how he raped them and how he's gonna pay, shit, yo, and other such nigger nonsense that alleges to "keep it real".
So they dragged out the flabby and pasty-White skinhead rapist and hung him.
NOW TELL ME BITCH, HOW THOSE BLACK WOMEN WERE BEING ABUSED?!?!