>>16
"You clearly know little about the rise of Pinochet."
He. Was. Elected. Democratically. Whatelse is there to care about? If its the peoples wish to live in servitude to Moscow so be it. Or is popular rule against your ideology?
I dont have the time nor the stamina (long day) to wiki research every bit of factoid in your post so i´ll just sum it up. Whatever he did, the US supported Pinochet, they traded with him afterwards and (i assume as this is praxis) they blocked any attempt at condemnation from the UN. And do you really believe Victor Jara was one of Allendes gunmen? Idiot school must miss you dearly after your graduation.
Okay, so now its not illegal aliens per se, only hispanic illegal aliens we are concerned about. Thanks for the illuminating clarification. Yet i fail to see how the lack of condemnation from the hispanic community leaders about the rampant racism against whitey among its ranks converts into anecdotal evidence into real evidence. Explain please who your brain works, because the maze is to complicated for such a simpleton as me. Im not hispanic so i plead agnostic about their values. I plead agnostic about white values also btw (yet im white! Go figure, no please, go figure).
So open borders are not some principle, rather its something you do when there is no loss, ie completly instrumental to achieve higher degree of growth. Is this indicative of the libertarian mind set, that anything goes as long as it works? Why then not swedish socialism? Why then not nazism? Why then not medieval slavery? Has your science declared some succeses to be fails arbitrarily or is there method to this madness?