Why is libertarianism so infallible?

It is due to it being the application of political science. It does not permit failed policies to be continued fruitlessly year after year with idealistic fervour, it is next to impossible for anyone surrounded by fierce libertarian critics to continue clinging on to lies. It is a purely functional machine, lubricated with justice and fueled by free speech.

>>913
Your argument is exactly that, you have repeatedly claimed socialism was etatism, which is plain and simple wrong. The fact that you think like that was proved by you representing state capitalism and bush as socialist, and your fallacious definition - what you have repeated now only serves to confirm it, but you are too stupid to realize again. Your definition of socialism is wrong, not only that, but you tried to confirm your fallacy in a pathetic way, I guess again due to your ignorance. It is more like, apple is red, apple is a fruit, therefore bricks are fruits due to them being red. What was repeatedly told here was that you did not understand what socialism is (and before, that you didn't understand macroeconomics, all which you could only respond with various patters of ignoring evidence and crying). I have said this several times now, but really, this is pathetic.

Enjoy your idle talk.