>>139
I emplaced a question mark apon the end of both the sentences in question to denote that they are suppositions, not statements.
>>140
Of course libertarians believe their values are unquestionable, if they didn't they wouldn't be libertarians. Libertarianism is a mostly modern concept which is merely the result of a scientific analysis of systems of government which have been succesful in the past. It can be seen that resisting tyranny and focussing the force of justice towards the preservation of liberty is primary in ending strife that is the result of criminal systems of government. The problems of today pale in comparison to the problems of the past but this doesn't mean we libertarianism is obsolete, extending this line of thought yields logical straight forward solutions that many corporations and companies adopt on a similiar scale, but which the government is unwilling to even test. Libertarians are of course strong on civil rights.
>>141
Libertarians are not extremists, the implementation of libertarian principles would be an evolutionary process. There would be strong debate on conscription, many regulations and high pay for those conscripted. Also bear in mind after 22 years of libertarianism a large proportion of Russians would have their own rifles, pistols, possibly heavy and automatic weapons all embued with the good old libertarian "LIBERTY OR DEATH" mentality. I'm not sure if conscription would be a problem or the Nazis would want to invade.