Why is libertarianism so infallible?

It is due to it being the application of political science. It does not permit failed policies to be continued fruitlessly year after year with idealistic fervour, it is next to impossible for anyone surrounded by fierce libertarian critics to continue clinging on to lies. It is a purely functional machine, lubricated with justice and fueled by free speech.

>>140
Yeah, and the soviet union defeated fucking nazi germany in warfare on top of that, any libertarians have an idea how to fight the great patriotic war? "Oh you leave the line because you only got a clip of bullets and no rifle? Well, heres your fine."

>>136
Exactly whats wrong with libertarianism? Well, it has nothing to do with reality. Is that concrete enough? Otherwise, read a couple of the "libertarians sux cox" threads, they contain every scrap of criticism and most often it stands unanswered by the scardypants libertards. But may I direct a question towards you? Some liberfailians posted earlier that libertarianism is a science and that it is simlple to implement and easy to understand, but when i begged for a definition then i got bullshit. Maybe you can enlighten me and convert me?