Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Who has killed more Iraqi Civilians?

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-03 22:23 ID:Mem3U2C4

The coalition or the terrorists?

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-03 22:42 ID:vNg8/tbi

The coalition of terrorists...

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-05 11:38 ID:bWmFJD0z

As coalition soldiers don't blow themselves up in crowded places I'd say the terrorists won that race.

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-05 14:14 ID:lagNi+lE

As terrorists dont carpetbomb highly populated areas with napalm and clusterbombs I´d say the coalition won that race. And one can add that the terrorists werent killing anybody in Iraq before the invasion.

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-05 14:42 ID:1Yau8lpO

>>4
Terrorist target civilians, the only innocent people the coalition have killed were being used as human shields by the terrorists. And one can add that the terrorists were part of the government before the invasion.

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-05 19:32 ID:ylHeoAiJ

>>3
Maybe they should start... At least they'd be giving more effort than whatever the fuck they are doing now.
>>5
Cluster bombs don't discriminate. Human shields? WTF?! How's the view from up there? Or should I say down there... GB2sturmfag, faggot.

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-05 19:50 ID:lagNi+lE

>>5
One can add that terrorists that are part of a government are not terrorists at all, but regular combatants. You know, like the ku klux klan before the defeat of the confederacy.

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-05 21:04 ID:ylHeoAiJ

>>7
Exactly. Nobody gives themselves the term "terrorist", it's given by others.

The US has been regarded as terrorists for decades in the middle east but did we ever hear about that? Nope. Why? Jews.

Dang, I forgot my hood...

Name: !Fi6ARuG5Ac 2013-08-13 22:19

blarble

Name: !49FaiWrakQ 2013-08-13 22:19

blarble

Name: !SL2f2oXNBU 2013-08-13 22:20

blarble

Name: !96BMuVDZJo 2013-08-13 22:20

blarble

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List