Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

What Really Divides Us?

Name: Anonymous 2007-05-30 1:25 ID:/FjMPZOu

The left argues that stringent federal laws are needed to combat racism, always implying of course that southern states are full of bigoted rednecks who would oppress minorities if not for the watchful eye of Washington. They ignore, however, the incredible divisiveness created by their collectivist big-government policies.

Racism is simply an ugly form of collectivism, the mindset that views humans only as members of groups and never as individuals. Racists believe that all individual who share superficial physical characteristics are alike; as collectivists, racists think only in terms of groups. By encouraging Americans to adopt a group mentality, the advocates of so-called "diversity" actually perpetuate racism. Their intense focus on race is inherently racist, because it views individuals only as members of racial groups.

Conservatives and libertarians should fight back and challenge the myth that collectivist liberals care more about racism. Modern liberalism, however well intentioned, is a byproduct of the same collectivist thinking that characterizes racism. The continued insistence on group thinking only inflames racial tensions.

The true antidote to racism is liberty. Liberty means having a limited, constitutional government devoted to the protection of individual rights rather than group claims. Liberty means free-market capitalism, which rewards individual achievement and competence, not skin color, gender, or ethnicity. In a free market, businesses that discriminate lose customers, goodwill, and valuable employees – while rational businesses flourish by choosing the most qualified employees and selling to all willing buyers. More importantly, in a free society every citizen gains a sense of himself as an individual, rather than developing a group or victim mentality. This leads to a sense of individual responsibility and personal pride, making skin color irrelevant. Rather than looking to government to correct what is essentially a sin of the heart, we should understand that reducing racism requires a shift from group thinking to an emphasis on individualism.

Name: Anonymous 2007-05-30 1:32 ID:mY/WpqdV

liberty also protects criminals.

Name: Anonymous 2007-05-30 2:23 ID:J75BN7JX

Yeah seriously, fuck criminal rights. I say we just stone them to death in the streets know what I'm Saiyan?

Name: Anonymous 2007-05-30 4:35 ID:Kf8KRJW4

stones cost too much. you seen the price of my stones today? whew. let me tell you...

Name: Anonymous 2007-05-30 12:53 ID:pfcOVyb8

You know, France did away with the race question altogether by proclaiming that there was no race in the eyes of the government.  Seriously, they didn't even record race figures in the census. 

Of course, what this actually meant was that individual racism was unacknowledged and unchecked by the government.  Current situation - car burnings and riots in Paris on a regular basis, with a whole lot of excluded sons of Algerians ready to explode. 

The trouble with racism is that it confuses race with culture.  The two are different, and need to be separately addressed.  But you'll never fix cultural problems if some idiot's always tying them to a physical feature.  Our brains don't come in different colours.

Name: Anonymous 2007-05-30 12:58 ID:gz+BIU8w

( )( ) <--- Ass
_0.-_<--- Moses

Name: Anonymous 2007-05-30 15:03 ID:qP7L3CLy

why is moses eyeballing an ass?

Name: Anonymous 2007-05-30 15:06 ID:VewMOqUT

Republicans are for big government and big spending.

Name: Anonymous 2007-05-30 15:12 ID:VewMOqUT

Before Conservatives and Libertarians go fighting against other people, they should go fight poverty and lack of education in the red states and rural areas that they represent. Otherwise, they will continue leeching federal money.

Name: Anonymous 2007-05-30 20:03 ID:RIf33Ns8

i agree i belive that if the goverment would see people as indivguals then the most of the people would forget about race but there are still extremes out there and unless we remove them and give their childre away then it will never work.  also i am an advacit for smaller goverment it was desind to keep people in line not watch their every move.

Name: Anonymous 2007-05-30 20:50 ID:NmjW0QD2

>>10
If the governmet has the power to oppress someone's free speech and abduct their children how long until they decide everyone else is a threat? Do you have any idea how easy it is for people in the government to develop a mindset equal to Orwell's "a state at war with it's own people".

Go to the high street and you are treated like a king, the customer is king. It's because they want your money, but that's how you get treated.

Go to any government office and you are treated as yet another pain in the ass to deal with.

Go figure.

Name: Anonymous 2007-05-31 5:28 ID:oaGl1nGf

I think there are a few oceans in between that divide too...

No? Oh shi-

Name: Anonymous 2007-05-31 9:33 ID:9AnkTEz7

>>1

Not all races have the same potential to achieve in a meritocratic society. I am in favor of a liberal democracy but if you somehow think it would make race relations better you are wrong.

The current system gives minorities greater privileges than they would have in a fully laissez faire, color blind society. Most people still don’t accept the fact that blacks and Hispanics simply lack the genetic intelligence to achieve on the level of whites or Jews. I don't really want to turn this thread into a debate about this fact, seriously, go read The Bell Curve. Anyway, If were to live in a truly color blind society; racial discrimination laws were abolished and we had a laissez faire free market, then all we would see is blacks and Hispanics sinking further economically and socially, creating even greater social tension and accusations of racism. In fact most firms and universities are desperate to take on blacks and Hispanics to show how "diverse" they are and meet quotas. The problem is the lack of talent they find. Still, they will take a less qualified minority person for the mentioned reasons. In reality, the most dominant force of racism in the US today is anti-white.

Name: Anonymous 2007-05-31 12:38 ID:pESyEAXy

>>13 "I don't really want to turn this thread into a debate about this fact, seriously, go read The Bell Curve"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Bell_Curve#Flawed_assumptions

i fucked your mother you stupid faggot.

Name: Anonymous 2007-05-31 12:58 ID:9AnkTEz7

Oh yeah your right The Bell Curve is all bullshit... black ppl are just as smart as Jews. Africa is a shithole because of them damn crackas invadin' and shit. How could I have been so stupid.

But seriously, instead of asking for proof of intelligence differences in races how about you provide some proof they are the same?

No matter how overwhelming the evidence is, most are unwilling to accept it. Also, extremely ironic talking about flawed assumtions when you automatically assume equal intelligence amongst races without any proof. You have been brainwashed well sir.

Name: Anonymous 2007-05-31 13:02 ID:rrO11z3t

poo

Name: Anonymous 2007-05-31 13:02 ID:XDwrv0tC

Jews have had a harder time than blacks, why aren't they retarded aswell?

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List