Reactionaries are awesome!

The definition of reactionary is not someone who resists change for the sake of it since I have heard many people being called reactionary without any consideration of the merit of their arguments. So explain to me, why is being a reactionary wrong? If someone has just disproved you logically in front of hundreds of people or in the media and you call them a "reactionary" just becuase they disagree with you, how does this magically refute the point they've made?

Most of the time reactionaries are clearly excellent people who provide criticism and prevent politics from being (completely) dominated by ranting extremists. Sometimes they just resist change because they have a chip on their shoulder or they are just stupid, but this rarely happens. People who are in the spotlight and are called reactionaries tend to be people who have said something that makes the people calling them reactionaries fearful.

Spoilers: There's no such thing as reactionary.
Call each other like that became uncool in the 80s as people realized that those who did it were actually reactionaries themselves.

>>1
They just enjoy repeating marxist terminology and then going "WHY DO U THINK I AM TEH COMMUNIST LOL U R PARANOID, U BELIEVE IN RELIJANS CAUSE THEY ARE OPIATES OF THE MASSES AND I AM SUPERIOR BECAUSE ONLY I KNOW HOW TEH WORLD WORKS BNECAUSE I READ KARL MARX"

..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... FUCK FUCK FUCK IUIUIUIUIUIUASASASASASASAASDFAASDFAASDFAASDFFDFDFDFDFDSSFSFSFSFSFSFFSSFSFSSFFDFDFFDFDFDFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFASASDASDASDFDSDFFDFDFDSAASDFFDFDFDSAASDFASDFASDFFFFDSAFFDASFFDSAFFDSAFFDSAFFDSAAFAFSDFFDSASDFFDSAAFADADADADADADDSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFFSSFFDSSDFDSFSDFDSF

>>4
gb2 sociology class

wow, this thread is pretty fail.

you're moms pretty white.
And pretty fail. Like your vagina head you fucking dumbfuck.

>>6
Cry harder, socialism is just a load of naive hippy shit that only makes the proletariat poorer and more oppressed by making him subservient to his new national socialist masters.

your moms a socalist bastard. shut up.

>>6
yup. anon was right. thread = megafail

>>10
he was pretty right as well.

>>8
QFT

by making him subservient to his new national socialist masters
Instead of subservient of his new corporate masters?

Same shit, different pile. Both situations suck. Whine more.

>>13
Wrong, both shit, but different shit. Corporate masters aren't above the law, so their shit is harder to pass. Socialist shit is like diarrhea, it sprays into the toilet and when you think you are just farting it comes out all wet and makes a wet stain that drips down your leg.

>>13
Oh and coorporate shit comes in nice hard clumps, easy to dispose of. High fibre.

>>14
Corporate masters aren't above the law, so their shit is harder to pass.
There are two scenarios at play here. Scenario A: corporations working within a state that has a strong government. Scenario B: corporations working within a state that has a weak government.

Result:
A: private interests grease the right hands and eventually have their way.
B: private interests are the centers of power, so become de facto "government" themselves.

Either way you're fucked. The only difference is that if there's a strong government it takes a bit more finesse to get what you want, since the people are also watching. If it's weak, you don't need finesse, just bigger guns.

You need to think of it in terms of power, not the illusive public/private false dichotomy. Power fills a vacuum.

>>16
QFT.

look at the power mining companies have. they are already above the law.

>>16
I think you've already answerred your question. With A, the stronger the government the less oppression there is. With B, the stronger the government the more oppression there is.

Vacuums are filled by coorporations in A and filled by uprising thugs mounting coups in B.