Richardson is the one Dem I would seriously consider voting for, supposing he wins the primaries. Richardson ftw!
Richardson is:
1. A Second Amendment Advocate (Endorsed by the NRA in his candidacy for governor.)
2. Pro-medical marijuana
3. Pro Free Trade
4. Anti-tax
Name:
Anonymous2007-04-11 20:12 ID:R7U6EoaW
And this guy is a Democrat?
UNPOSSIBLE!
Name:
Anonymous2007-04-11 20:26 ID:ONLrqAIC
if the world isnt black and white why do people separate into left/right, dems/reps, etc?
think about it...
Name:
Anonymous2007-04-11 20:51 ID:0yHmXr57
ANTI-TAX! Right On!
Abolish all taxes so the government and military will collapse and America be overrun with Beaners and blown up by Rag-heads!
Read. My. Lips. NO NEW TAXES!
Name:
Anonymous2007-04-12 11:41 ID:JcDLMoQh
>>1
"the one Dem I would seriously consider voting for"
Considering their actions over the last two years I won't vote for one again in this lifetime.
>>5
It sounds like you never would have regardless.
When you decide you will never vote for a certain party, they have no reason to ever try please you. Their best efforts would be wasted on someone who has already made up their mind.
This is called partisanship. You adopted it, now enjoy it.
Name:
Anonymous2007-04-14 1:50 ID:TEcdCR7z
>>5
Because political parties never change positions on anything, and every politician in each party shares the same views as the rest of the party!
Good luck with the Downs there, champ.
Name:
Anonymous2007-04-14 2:16 ID:HpQdJhz/
One thing about free trade, is we don't have it right now, PARTICULARLY in our dealings with foreign nations, with all the tariffs we have, it comes as little surprise that Developing nations become chained to the whims of the Industrialized nations, as WTO financing mandates that they abolish any protective tariffs of their own. Neo-mercantilism is what we have right now, unless someone can explain to me why US exports to the third world pay no tariffs, while the third world imports get fucking crushed under our protective tariffs.
Another is the obvious favoritism, goods from Britain have 1/20th the tariff from somewhere like Bangladesh.
Name:
Anonymous2007-04-14 3:02 ID:HNgwO/fG
>>8
100% correct. Socialists and liberals are so immensely retarded they do not realise that directing law enforcement more than anything is responsible for preventing exploitation and poverty. It has very little to do with the economic system used and even in this subject a high level of economic freedom is preferable to state control. They don't care if the regulation harms foreigners, after all they can't vote for them and to them any regulation brings the evil we$tern capitali$sts closer to communism so it must be good.
End socialism. End big business owning fat cats bribing the government, thus by definition employing socialist practices!
Name:
Anonymous2007-04-14 8:42 ID:yLYpvmfc
>>9
you bring up a good point
If you give the government power to intervene with economic matters instead of the consumer doing shit on his own, it always results in National Socialism.
Kinda like Animal Farm amirite?
Name:
Anonymous2007-04-14 10:04 ID:4IuqcRIL
Why the FUCK would you be pro-Free Trade? So some boogaloo in Africa can steal your jerb?
Name:
Anonymous2007-04-14 10:57 ID:c7Qo3NM/
Because free-trade is so good for so many people, to be blunt.