>>147
If you think that Libertarians are against corporate authoritarianism, you're in the wrong party. They're for it, as they see the corporations power is limited to who buys their shit.
Wal*Mart is the perfect example.
Lolbertarian: Why do Socialists and COMMUNISTS haet Wal*Mart so much!?
Average Joe: Well, because they see their business practices as wrong. They don't like how they treat their employees, and they don't like multi-national corporations working in conjunction with 3rd world governments to set up labor camps.
Lolbertarian: WELL IF THEY DON'T LIKE WAL*MART THEY SHOULDN'T SHOP THERE!
This is the error in the Libertarian thought. Wal*Mart offers commodities that the minimum wage laborer can buy at a lower cost than he or she would normally pay. "Personal responsibility" in this consumption model doesn't work -- Some people are limited in their options. Libertarians don't know the power of their own creation -- Tyrannical rule by monopolies and private ownership of the means of production = Fucks people without ownership of the means of production.
Once the means of production are secured, and inheritance incorporated, you get the same families in control over commodities and you get the same poor class working the same jobs to support the corporate families which then re-sell the commodities back to the poor.
The process of labor steals the time of the poor to produce a commodity that has surplus value. This value of labor is then re-sold for profit to the poor. Marxian translation = The rich get richer and the poor continue to be fucked. Why are the poor fucked? The means of production are in the hands of the capitalists.