preface: libertarianism won't work because there are too many retards who would use their freedom to do dumb shit and there wouldn't be enough prisons/electric chairs for all of them. libertarianism assumes the average person isn't a retard, but they are. I don't know what would work, but it sure as shit isn't lolbertarianism.
that said, a shitload of people don't realize that the reason most big businesses are so big isn't because of capitalism, it's because of government subsidies that wouldn't exist under libertarianism. also, the whole goddamn basis of the movement is to protect/empower the individual, not corporations. read:
>The world we seek to build is one where individuals are free to follow their own dreams in their own ways, without interference from government or any authoritarian power.
authoritarian includes corporations, fyi. the only arguments thus far against it have been "you'll work 13 hour days" which is flat wrong, and "lol it's trendy", which isn't even an argument.
>>33
that'd put him on the left 90 degree angle. US libertarian party (and a lot of the trendy internet libs) are on the right side. that isn't a tough concept. even the dumbfucks over at wikipedia understand this.