What does capitalism have to do evil?

I believe it is my duty to case mocking liberals for my own entertainment and reveal what you are incapable of thinking without a person of average intelligence to aid you. That's right, I'm about to prove you wrong and I am not claiming to be an "intellectual" like some arrogant smug cunt, I'm using it to prove you are an idiot which is the truth. Also I am going to tell it to you straight, I'm not going to attempt social engineering and come up with some nonsensical bullshit in order to hide my true intentions which does nothing but insult the intelligence of the people exposed to it.

Capitalism isn't the cause of all the problems you attribute to it. Capitalism is just an economic system with as many problems with corruption as communism or any other economic system.

It's elementary logic.

A occurs in the presence of B. Does this mean B is the cause of A? It does not.

The real cause of corruption and immoral behaviour are systems which permit people to do so and in which motivation to enforce justice is utilised to a high degree. Both capitalism and communism fail to do this in comparison to the free market, which is a completely seperate philosophy and has no place in your over-simplified abstract almost child-like view of the world.

You are idiots.

>>9
I am a reactionary? To what? Your ideals?

You are not the first person to ignore my arguments, your only virtue are the new refreshing ways in which you slip by them.

You do care about liberalism or you would not be talking to me. You are free to gb2 /d/ and fap any time you want, yet you come here to discuss politics.

Adam Smith's idea of the free market is nothing like Marx's idea of capitalism.

Yes, I do use a dictionary. Since you haven't mentionned anything else concerning the difference between a philosophy and idealism, does this mean you agree with me that there is a difference between the philosophy and science of free market economics and the idealism of communism?

I don't need to have read the bible in Hebrew to criticise christianity and I don't need to spend 3 years studying PHD sociology in order to criticise Liberalism, Capitalism, Communism, Marx or Engels. If marxist intellectuals are so superior why is their argument so weak that they must avoid debate?

I am a reactionary and a scientist. I both resist your attempts at social engineering which are dishonest and restrictive in nature and compose my own opinions based on the facts with emphasis on discussing my ideas without restriction with others. I accept criticism of my ideas, but so far it seems you are pre-occupied with criticism of my person.