>>46
God, you are a fucking moron. It's not about evidence. It's about common fucking sense. I could say "In my opinion, 1=2, evidence shows that 1 and 2 are both numbers, therefore by the transitive property 1=2. You don't have any evidence that 1 does not equal 2, therefore I am right." No, it doesn't work like that. Using bullshit statistics (as I have already pointed out) does not give your argument more merit, and saying that we only have a difference of opinion doesn't mean anything.
"Your opinion" that people kill because of convenience is just fucking flat out WRONG, you can believe it all you want but it is wrong. All it takes is a rudimentary understanding of human psychology and some basic common sense to see this. Why, why would someone EVER kill someone because it was convenient?? When has it EVER happened? When has there EVER been ANY scientific studies that show that a person will kill because of convenience? It is not my job to provide evidence that it isn't a reason, when you make an outrageous claim like that that goes against basic common sense it is YOUR job to provide empirical evidence to support your argument. This is not a "status quo", you are wrong unless you can prove that you are right.
"As for criminals having access to guns whether they are illegal or not I say "no". That's not true. In countries with strict gun laws criminals don't mainly use guns. They use knives and blunt objects. Some guns find their way onto the black market of course, with smuggling and whatnot, but not enough to satisfy the demand.
And here we go again with the fascism. Throw in some founding fathers, a dash of freedom and maybe.. God? Is that the star spangled-banner I hear? I can't relate, I'm sorry."
What the christ are you talking about? You are arguing against yourself... I already addressed this argument in my previous post, try actually reading.