>>43
nice baseless generalization. "Dawkins discussions always go something like this". BASIS FOR THAT ASSERTION? you prat!
next, "but beyond that he's just a ranting extremist using atheism to justify bigotry." no, it's all based on deduction and logic. I addressed that in
>>38. you have an ostensibly poor grasp of the meanings of basic terms. I suggest you look up, say, "ranting" and then CONFER IT TO YOUR OWN DAMN POST