>>41
What logic am I contesting? You have to realise there are more than 2 sides to this discussion. I am not religious in any way and my ciriticism of Dawkins is legitimate.
This is my argument, it can't be simpler. Dawkins discussions always go something like this.
1: There is no proof god exists.
2: Religious people are ignorant lol!
3: Religious people are responsible for all the world's problems.
I'm with Dawkins up to step 1, but beyond that he's just a ranting extremist using atheism to justify bigotry. As an atheist I seriously want Dawkins to admit that he has become what he hates and see a psychologist about his serious penis envy and inferiority complex issues. For his own sake.