>>26
You must be a christian zealot or a sympathizer. Saying science and religion cannot co-exist is making a simple observation that stems from a general understanding that science is based on seeking truth through fact and evidence-- and that religion is based on faith.
Don't come down on Dawkins because you don't understand the difference between spirituality- which speaks to learning the nature of GOD and religion- which seeks to control society through faith and lies.
The reason Dawkins' actions aren't hypocritical is because he hasn't started murderous crusades against christians or told people to start bombing chruches and kill the religious. Telling to people to stand up politically to Christians might seem hypocritical (because you're stupid), but that's just the nature of the game. He's saying that people shouldn't be ruled by religious thought and there's nothing really wrong with that. Putting "FUCKING HYPOCRITICAL" in all caps isn't doing shit to prove otherwise.
When I say Christians (And religion) is wrong, I do so based on the factual inconsistences with the bible and things that run alien to simple proven knowledge. I do so because of a history of violence against science and reason. But I don't wish Christians to be eradicated- just educated. There IS a difference. I believe in a God, or possibly Gods, but when that view tries to oust KNOWEDLGE and SCIENCE with bunk bullshit...that where I cross the line.
Dawkins doesn't appear to be trying to prove God wrong, JUST religion.
When religion comes into government or people base their politics off of their religion, that is when there is a problem.
Yes and THAT is what Dawkins addresses, idiot.