>>15
>This doesn't make a bit of fucking sense. Dawkins isn't doing what he does to "Affect Science". He's doing it to affect society. How is that not obvious to you? If Christians are out converting people, then it's not wrong for Darwin to do so. Atheist don't have conflict with Christians because they're trying to competely saturate the world with their view, it's because they're wrong and ignoring science.
Yes he is, Dawkins has said numerous times that science and religion cannot coexist. As in, impossible, and the only way to move forward with science is to get rid of religion. If Christians are converting people, than it IS wrong for Dawkins to do so, how can YOU not see that?? Athiests who hate religion usually cite conversion and the crusades as negative effects of religion, so if one of those people makes it their mission to convert religious people that is FUCKING HYPOCRITICAL.
You can't say Christians are "wrong". God in theory is all powerful, he can be anything and do anything. Maybe he is really a giant bearded old man. I don't think so, but it's possible. You can point out factual inconsistencies in the Bible, but you will never prove the idea of god "wrong".
People believing in a higher power does not affect science, or anything for that matter. When religion comes into government or people base their politics off of their religion, that is when there is a problem.