Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Activists

Name: Jolly Roger 2007-02-09 14:59

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070209/sc_nm/japan_whaling_dc

I think the Japanese should hunt down and sink this vessel and hang all the survivors as pirates.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-09 16:04

>>1
No hangings. Public head cutting competition with two best swordsmen they can find.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-09 21:49

The Japanese aren't hunting them to extinction, what would be the point in that? They'd go out of business. Big business prefers steady stable assets, they are not pirates out for an easy buck who will disappear once people realise the damage they've done.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-09 23:00

HA HA ONE GOT STUCK IN A PROPELLER OF THE SHIP

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-10 1:28

http://38.101.8.11/dl/6673245399554aff0c55a6bf0770f7fd/45cd5f60/video/movie_for_her_friend.wmv

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-10 2:07

>>3
Except whale population suffers tremendously when so many are killed off.  Should a calamity such as a loss of food supply or disease strike the whales, the population may not be large enough to survive.

Plus they said the same thing about tigers, now we've got so fucking few left.  Hunting is never a business run by one person who knows when to stop.  Our seas are being emptied of fish quite literally.  Sharks take fucking seven years to reproduce, whales longer, stop assuming everything breeds like rabbits.

I'm with the eco-terrorist/pirates on this one.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-10 2:38

>>6
Fishing companies are not stupid. They lobby the government to prevent poaching and factor in everything you have mentionned in detereminng how much they extract. If whales become extinct they lose everything and the eco-terrorists lose nothing.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-10 3:19

>>6
So what's so fucking big deal if some species dies off? I'm pretty sure we soon have technology to revive them anyway. It's important to protect environment, since we lack adequate technology to survive without trees for example, but animals aren't that important to us. We could even survive without them, but that would be bit boring and eating veggies sucks. As for whale hunting problem I'd look science to solve that in future. Create new mass-breeding whales for food and everyone's happy.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-10 4:35

>>8
>I have no concept of what most people call an "ecosystem"

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-10 5:54

penises are nice and fun to play with

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-10 6:33

>>10
you are a magnificent bastard

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-10 7:29

>>6
You're in favor of throwing acid on people to save the whales and i am in favor of feeding you to tigers and sharks. You're such a friend to the animals im sure you won't mind.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-10 9:35

>>8
other species will die because of the food web.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-10 16:54

did algore invent the food web?

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-10 17:48

>>14
yes, yes he did
he also invented inventing

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-10 21:33

>>15
Even the question mark?

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-10 21:52

>>16
Walt Whitman and Al Gore collaborated on that

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-12 2:38

>>12
6 would like to see you fucking try internet tough guy

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-12 4:51

>>18
I'd like to see you die in agony of cancer instead of using treatment derived from animal experimentation.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-12 8:42

>>18
punctuation is key, you inarticulate shit

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-13 9:50

Just two words:

Natural. Selection.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-14 14:18

>>13
Yes, but humans aren't part of it. Neither are domestic animals as they are breeded by humans. Honestly to us it doesn't matter shit if wild animals exist. If we have plants we can survive. If plants started to go extinct then I'd worry. That would be serious. Animals? Not so serious. If you count the big ones only. They're pretty useless. Now small ones and real small ones like insects have some real important jobs and would be worrying if they started to go extinct, but as long as we don't pollute too much that shouldn't be problem, since those species breed like hell.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-14 14:38

>>22
You must have a phd in ecology, sir!

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-14 15:12

>>23
Explain me how wild mammals are important for plant life and then I will change my views. I can't see how.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-14 15:13

>>21
One word, natural semen. Thread over.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-14 15:13

Groups like this along with the PETA are made up of people whose self-esteem is so low they believe that their race is less important than animals. They deserve slow, painful deaths by being mauled by animals.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-14 17:32

>>24
Many plants require animal fur and animals to consume their fruits to spread their seeds. Mammals also produce CO2 and large grazing mammals produce tons apon tons of fertilizer each day. Some species cannot compete with trees and need mammals to eat back the forests so that they can exist.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-14 21:52

>>24
More importantly, if we dont know the full extent of a system, we shouldnt fuck with said system. We have to assume that every block of the ecosystem is important for its overall function, and must assume that until we can prove this individual block is not important. You cant start exterminating species just because you assume they are unimportant and let the burden of proof be on the cautious, because its a irreversible process and its better to be safe than sorry.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-15 10:24

>>28 Don,t nobody fucking move!

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-15 12:17

>>29
Yeah, thats a real mature way of interpreting the cautionary principle. Next you take a drive, why not always drive faster than the speed limits, and fuck the safety belt, thats for pussies, and why do you always have to wash your hands after you've been to the lou?  

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-15 14:51

http://environment.guardian.co.uk/conservation/story/0,,2012562,00.html

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070215/wl_nm/japan_whaling_fire_dc_4;_ylt=AmEKmA56Xezg4.GhkS95XalNYhAF

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-15 14:52

hang 'em

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-15 22:00

>>28

Back to the caves, here we come!

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-16 14:53

>>33
Yes, back to the good old days when humans could commune with nature and compete with the fauna on a more or less equal basis. Remember when fast food included us?

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-16 16:12

Sounds more fun than Soylent Green.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-16 17:22

>>34
Bet life was more exciting though.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-17 0:43

>>36
oh yes, when your in the middle of the food chain you're never bored. And you don't have to listen to some asshole feeling sorry for what you kill and eat.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-17 14:31

>>36
You can try it in Africa. It's even more exiting in modern times.
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List
All trademarks and copyrights on this site are owned by their respective parties. All comments and posts are the responsibility of their own posters.
- Tinychan + 2ch Mode -