Pros: - Fast death without prolonged suffering
- Can collect the organs from the executed person and put them up to be donated to those who need them for transplants.
Cons: (you fill in)
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-16 1:46
Cons: Wasted potential.
Enslaving the destined-to-be-killed will result in profits. Don't just chop his head. Make him build you a row of guillotines, shine your shoes, suck your cock, and clean your house. Make him your temporary bitch. Then kill him. That way you get something out of it and it's not a total waste.
Every citizen should not have to suffer a violent death unless necessary to prevent others from sufferring a violent death. Slavery is a form of torture and torture is a form of violence and is unecessary if a criminal is already incarcerated.
To serve as a deterant criminals should be kept confined and isolated for most of the day (except for their 1 hour with a sky above their head) until they are so bored they will perform labour just for the chance of getting out of their jail cell. Even then they should be kept physically seperate from other inmates, but allowed to talk whilst they labour.
Companies can pay to use the inmates for labour, only minor offenders are allowed to leave the prison as chain gangs to dig drainage ditches or whatever.
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-16 11:32
The problem with prison labor is that it competes with regular labor, meaning actually less profit totally.
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-16 13:31
I was going to type:
'Lol welcome to the halfwit thread',
and then I read some of the other threads on this board,
and I thought that compared to some of the other threads here, this is a work of genius.
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-16 14:17
>>5
Wrong. If you the economy is a pyramid with plentiful workers at the bottom and scarce increasingly skilled workers as you go up, if you put prisoners to work as labourers (plentiful workers), then you increase the economy and upgrade free citizens into higher tiers of the pyramid.
Of course free citizens are naturally more desirable than convicts who have to be watched over at all times or can only work within a prison compound.
For example a growing company hires out a prison as a production line for some menial task, pays the prison the same amount as they would a free citizen worker and promotes some of their workers to status of supervisor over the convicts. Many win, no one loses.
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-16 20:25
>>7
That's a very sensible idea. The only problem with that is the transnational progressives we have dominating one major party and their opposition to anything messy or smacks of actually punishing people.
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-17 2:05
Wikipedia:
"From its first use, there has been debate as to whether the guillotine always provided as swift a death as Dr Guillotin hoped. With previous methods of execution, there was little concern about the suffering inflicted. But where the guillotine was invented specifically to be "humane", the issue was seriously considered. Furthermore, there is the possibility that the very swiftness of the guillotine only prolonged the victim's suffering. The blade cuts quickly enough that there is relatively little impact on the brain case, and perhaps less likelihood of immediate unconsciousness than with a more violent decapitation, or long-drop hanging.
Audiences to guillotinings told numerous stories of blinking eyelids, moving eyes, movement of the mouth, even an expression of "unequivocal indignation" on the face of the decapitated Charlotte Corday when her cheek was slapped."
GREAT IDEA
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-17 2:11
a chicken runs around after you chop the head off of it, does this mean it is not dead?
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-17 6:11
^ ^
(( ゚ д ゚ )
つ つ
FIGHT THE MACHINE
Name:
Xel2007-01-17 9:38
DP pushers are pure sissies. They want the death, the isolation, the trepidation and fear of the executee, the vengeance, the righteousness and the moral superiority (they feel a little like Yahve when someone is deemed unworthy) but when it finally comes to the good stuff they can't take the blood or the snap of a neck.
Retarded conservatives they are. So, government can't be trusted with your money but it is flawless enough to whack people without subjecting an innocent to it?
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-17 13:12
BRING BACK CRUCIFIXION!!!
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-17 14:54
>>12
I know what you mean Xel. The death penalty (the power of the state to take away a person's life... even a prisoner) conveys far more power to the state than does the power to tax (not saying the power to tax is anything to disregard, of course). I'm a libertarian & anti-death penalty.